ArticlePatient education and counseling2016
Patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening pre- and post-guidelines: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pragmatic Randomized-Controlled Trial of a Digital Outreach Intervention for Lung Cancer Screening: mPATH-Lung (Mobile Patient Technology for Health-Lung)
Leveraging Social Media to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness, Knowledge and Uptake in High-Risk Populations
LEAD Pilot Study: Leveraging the Emergency Department to Address SDOH and Reduce Lung Cancer Screening Disparities
CLEAR-LUNG (Community-Level Effectiveness to Advance Reach in Lung Cancer Screening)
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Leveraging Social Media to Achieve Population-Level Reach of Lung Cancer Screening-Eligible Individuals: A RE-AIM Framework Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Assessing Factors Associated With Patient-Provider Discussions About Lung Cancer Screening Using Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization.Clinical lung cancer · 2025Article
- Association of Telehealth Encounters With Lung Cancer Screening Consultation in the U.S.: Preliminary Results.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- A community-based approach to address lung cancer screening disparities in the black community using the Witness ProjectBMC public health · 2025Article
- Patient-clinician discussions on lung cancer screening in the United States before and after 2021 guidelines.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- What Goes into Patient Selection for Lung Cancer Screening? Factors Associated with Clinician Judgments of Suitability for Screening.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Patient message preferences to promote clinical conversations about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A discrete choice experiment.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Determinants of Lung Cancer Screening in a Minnesota Urban Indigenous Community: A Community-Based, Participatory, Action-Oriented Study.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Provider and patient perspectives to improve lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography 5 years after Medicare coverage: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- "It's a decision I have to make": Patient perspectives on smoking and cessation after lung cancer screening decisions.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Predicting attitudes towards screening for neurodegenerative diseases using OCT and artificial intelligence: Findings from a literature review.Journal of public health research · 2022Article
- Examination of the Association Between Access to Care and Lung Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Smokers.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Integration Through Connecting in Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Studies.Western journal of nursing research · 2020Article
- Promoting Clinical Conversations about Lung Cancer Screening: Exploring the Role of Perceived Online Social Support.Journal of health communication · 2020Article
- Implementing Decision Coaching for Lung Cancer Screening in the Low-Dose Computed Tomography Setting.JCO oncology practice · 2020Article
- Using Social Media as a Platform for Increasing Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2020Article
- "To know or not to know…?" Push and pull in ever smokers lung screening uptake decision-making intentions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn 2013, the USPSTF issued a Grade B recommendation that long-term current and former smokers receive lung cancer screening. Shared decision-making is important for individuals considering screening, and patient-provider discussions an essential component of the process. We examined prevalence and predictors of lung cancer screening discussions pre- and post-USPSTF guidelines.
methodsData were obtained from two cycles of the Health Information National Trends Survey (2012; 2014). The analyzed sample comprised screening-eligible current and former smokers with no personal history of lung cancer (n=746 in 2012; n=795 in 2014). Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted; patient-reported discussion about lung cancer screening with provider was the outcome of interest.
resultsContrary to expectations, patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening were more prevalent pre-guideline, but overall patient-provider discussions were low in both years (17% in 2012; 10% in 2014). Current smokers were more likely to have had a discussion than former smokers. Significant predictors of patient-provider discussions included family history of cancer and having healthcare coverage.
conclusionsThe prevalence of patient-provider discussions about lung cancer screening is suboptimal. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: There is a critical need for patient and provider education about shared decision-making and its importance in cancer screening decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.