Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27241815›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2016

Three measures of explained variation for correlated survival data under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model.

Gordon Honerkamp-Smith, Ronghui Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Concentration and genetic regulation of sex hormone binding globulin and fracture risk in older women.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gordon Honerkamp-SmithDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
Ronghui XuDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
SAN DIEGO CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTEUL1RR031980 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2010 to 2011
$14.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of explained variation are useful in scientific research, as they quantify the amount of variation in an outcome variable of interest that is explained by one or more other variables. We develop such measures for correlated survival data, under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model. Because different approaches have been studied in the literature outside the classical linear regression model, we investigate three measures R(2) , Rres2, and ρ(2) that quantify three different population coefficients. We show that although the three population measures are not the same, they reflect similar amounts of variation explained by the predictors. Among the three measures, we show that R(2) , which is the simplest to compute, is also consistent for the first population measure under the usual asymptotic scenario when the number of clusters tends to infinity. The other two measures, on the other hand, all require that in addition the cluster sizes be large. We study the properties of the measures both analytically and through simulation studies. We illustrate their different usage on a multi-center clinical trial and a recurrent events data set. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Linear ModelsProportional Hazards ModelsHumansSurvival Analysisclustered survival dataexplained randomnessmulti-center clinical trialrecurrent events

Identifiers

PMID27241815
PMCPMC5012918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.