Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27240858›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2016

Fecal diagnostics in combination with serology: best test to establish STEC-HUS.

Kioa L Wijnsma, Sheila A M van Bommel, Thea van der Velden, Elena Volokhina, Michiel F Schreuder, Lambertus P van den Heuvel, Nicole C A J van de Kar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Constipation and hemolytic uremic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Complement in Secondary Thrombotic Microangiopathy.Kidney international reports · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kioa L WijnsmaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1901, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Kioa.Wijnsma@radboudumc.nl.
Sheila A M van BommelDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1901, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Thea van der VeldenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Elena VolokhinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Michiel F SchreuderDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1901, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lambertus P van den HeuvelDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1901, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Nicole C A J van de KarDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1901, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the majority of pediatric patients, the hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) is caused by an infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), mostly serotype O157. It is important to discriminate between HUS caused by STEC and complement-mediated HUS (atypical HUS) due to differences in treatment and outcome. As STEC and its toxins can only be detected in the patient's stool for a short period of time after disease onset, the infectious agent may go undetected using only fecal diagnostic tests. Serum antibodies to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of STEC persist for several weeks and may therefore be of added value in the diagnosis of STEC.

methodsAll patients with clinical STEC-HUS who were treated at Radboud University Medical Center between 1990 and 2014 were included in this retrospective single-center study. Clinical and diagnostic microbiological data were collected. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies against LPS of STEC serotype O157 were detected by a serological assay (ELISA).

resultsData from 65 patients weres available for analysis. Fecal diagnostic testing found evidence of an STEC infection in 34/63 patients (54 %). Serological evidence of STEC O157 was obtained in an additional 16 patients. This is an added value of 23 % (p < 0.0001) when the serological antibody assay is used in addition to standard fecal diagnostic tests to confirm the diagnosis STEC-HUS. This added value becomes especially apparent when the tests are performed more than 7 days after the initial manifestation of the gastrointestinal symptoms.

conclusionsThe serological anti-O157 LPS assay clearly makes a positive contribution when used in combination with standard fecal diagnostic tests to diagnose STEC-HUS and should be incorporated in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialChildChild, PreschoolEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157FecesFemaleHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansImmunoglobulin MInfantLipopolysaccharidesMaleRetrospective StudiesSerum Bactericidal Antibody AssayAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin MLipopolysaccharidesAnti-O157 antibodiesDiagnosticsSerological LPS antibody detectionSTEC-HUSSTEC serotype O157

Identifiers

PMID27240858
PMCPMC5039220
OpenAlexW2419179751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.