Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27240791›Full record

ReviewHNO2016

[Anatomy and physiology of the nasolacrimal ducts].

F Paulsen, F Garreis, M Schicht, L Bräuer, M J Ali, S Sel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A New Organotypic 3D Slice Culture ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F PaulsenInstitut für Anatomie, Lehrstuhl II, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 19, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. friedrich.paulsen@fau.de.
F GarreisInstitut für Anatomie, Lehrstuhl II, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 19, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
M SchichtInstitut für Anatomie, Lehrstuhl II, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 19, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
L BräuerInstitut für Anatomie, Lehrstuhl II, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 19, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
M J AliThe Institute of Dacryology, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
S SelUniversitätsaugenklinik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEAugenklinik Heidelberg · DEL V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmologists and interventional radiologists are not the only professionals for whom diseases of the efferent tear duct system occupy centre stage; this applies also to ENT specialists involving endonasal conservative or surgical treatment. On the basis of current knowledge and taking account of results yielded by own research in recent years and of clinical aspects, we here give an overview of basic knowledge on the anatomy and physiology of the nasolacrimal system. In doing so functional aspects regarding tear transport as well as embryological and pathophysiological issues are integrated.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicModels, BiologicalHumansNasolacrimal DuctTearsCanaliculiEfferent tear ductsLacrimal sacNasolacrimal ductTear outflow

Identifiers

PMID27240791
OpenAlexW2414592727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.