ReviewUpdates in surgery2016
Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Robot-assisted esophageal surgery].Magyar onkologia · 2024Review
- Volume-outcome in oncological surgery: reflections on education and training.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Sarcopenia and Patient's Body Composition: New Morphometric Tools to Predict Clinical Outcome After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: a Multicenter Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Application of ERAS protocol in esophagectomy: a national survey among Italian centers performing esophageal surgery.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Operator Experience on Outcome of Hepatic Artery Embolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Tertiary Cancer Center.Academic radiology · 2018Article
- Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?Visceral medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer incidence is rapidly increasing in the western countries. Adenocarcinoma has recently become the most frequent subtype because of the changes in lifestyle. As observed for other types of surgery, even for esophageal surgery better results have been observed in centers with high volume of activity. Countries with formal policies of centralization, as Great Britain and The Netherlands, have got lower mortality and longer survival than those obtained before the centralization program introduction and of those countries without centralization programs. However, concerns about accessibility to high volume hospitals for lower level social strata have emerged in different countries. In Italy most of the esophagectomies for cancer are performed in very low volume centers with limited experience. High volume centers with >20 cases/year are few but, even if managing patients with more severe comorbidities have got a lower mortality and a shorter length of stay. The Aim of this paper is to identify the organizational, structural and volume requirements for accreditation of a center as an esophageal surgery center. Special attention must be given to a multidisciplinary approach involving different highly skilled specialists with the creation of a multidisciplinary team and individualized diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27240756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.