Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27240535›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2016

A systematic review of calcium channel antagonists in bipolar disorder and some considerations for their future development.

A Cipriani, K Saunders, M-J Attenburrow, J Stefaniak, P Panchal, S Stockton, T A Lane, E M Tunbridge, J R Geddes, P J Harrison

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Leveraging the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. CACNA1C (CaNeuropharmacology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-8321
K SaundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
M-J AttenburrowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J StefaniakDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
P PanchalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
S StocktonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
T A LaneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
E M TunbridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
P J HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBWarneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

l-type calcium channel (LTCC) antagonists have been used in bipolar disorder for over 30 years, without becoming an established therapeutic approach. Interest in this class of drugs has been rekindled by the discovery that LTCC genes are part of the genetic aetiology of bipolar disorder and related phenotypes. We have therefore conducted a systematic review of LTCC antagonists in the treatment and prophylaxis of bipolar disorder. We identified 23 eligible studies, with six randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trials, all of which investigated verapamil in acute mania, and finding no evidence that it is effective. Data for other LTCC antagonists (diltiazem, nimodipine, nifedipine, methyoxyverapamil and isradipine) and for other phases of the illness are limited to observational studies, and therefore no robust conclusions can be drawn. Given the increasingly strong evidence for calcium signalling dysfunction in bipolar disorder, the therapeutic candidacy of this class of drugs has become stronger, and hence we also discuss issues relevant to their future development and evaluation. In particular, we consider how genetic, molecular and pharmacological data can be used to improve the selectivity, efficacy and tolerability of LTCC antagonists. We suggest that a renewed focus on LTCCs as targets, and the development of 'brain-selective' LTCC ligands, could be one fruitful approach to innovative pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder and related phenotypes.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, L-TypeDouble-Blind MethodHumansIsradipineNimodipineVerapamilCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, L-TypeIsradipineNimodipineVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID27240535
PMCPMC5030455
OpenAlexW2412736822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.