ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2016
The unique luminal staining pattern of cytokeratin 5/6 in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast may aid in differentiating it from its mimickers.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Female breast cancer classification using immunohistochemistry biomarkers staining in Botswana.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Breast adenoid cystic carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Cutaneous Adnexal Cylindroma of Breast: Epithelial Immunoreactivities for GATA-3, Mammaglobin, and E-Cadherin Do Not Equate to a Mammary Ductal Neoplasm.Case reports in pathology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) of the breast is an uncommon but distinct neoplasm composed of a dual cell population polarized around true glandular (luminal) spaces and pseudolumina. The aim of this study was to clarify whether various immunohistochemical markers (CK7, EMA, CD117, p63, calponin, CD10, S100, CK5/6, CK14, vimentin, and type IV collagen) can distinguish between the two cell types in classical AdCC (n = 14) and in collagenous spherulosis (n = 5). The sensitivity and specificity of these 11 markers to distinguish luminal from abluminal cells were evaluated using a curve created by plotting the true-positive rate (sensitivity) against the false-positive rate (1 - specificity) at threshold settings of 0, 10, 50, and 70 %. The most sensitive and specific markers for luminal cells in AdCC were CK7 and EMA; those for abluminal cells were type IV collagen, p63, and vimentin. CD10 and S100 did not act as abluminal markers in AdCC. CK5/6, one of the basal/myoepithelial markers, was expressed more frequently in luminal than in abluminal cells of AdCC. Thus, CK5/6 immunostaining resulted in a reverse expression pattern, analogous to what we recently documented in clear cells in mammary adenomyoepithelioma. In conclusion, compared with myoepithelial/abluminal cells of normal breast or collagenous spherulosis, the neoplastic abluminal cells of classical AdCC are characterized by enhanced vimentin and attenuated CD10 and S100. Furthermore, the luminal cells of AdCC show a unique aberrant staining pattern for CK5/6 that may aid in the differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.