Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27239556›Full record

ArticleAI matters2015

The Protégé Project: A Look Back and a Look Forward.

Mark A Musen, Protégé Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AI matters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. VO: The Vaccine Ontology.Scientific data · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hootation: A GUI and API library for ontology validation and verbalization.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark A MusenStanford University.
Protégé Team

Funding

Collaborative Development of Biomedical Ontologies and TerminologiesR01GM086587 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2009 to 2016
$4.1M
Protege: An Ontology-Development Platform for Biomedical ScientistsR01GM103316 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086587NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID27239556
PMCPMC4883684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.