Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27239381›Full record

ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2016

Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study.

P H S Kalmet, B B Koc, B Hemmes, R H M Ten Broeke, G Dekkers, P Hustinx, M G Schotanus, P Tilman, H M J Janzing, J M A Verkeyn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of a Model Care Pathway for Myasthenia Gravis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Minimizing Nonessential Follow-up for Hip Fracture Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
  9. Different approaches towards geriatric trauma care for hip fracture patients: an inter-hospital comparison.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of an orthogeriatrician on length of stay of elderly patient with hip fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary co-management program for the older hip fracture patients in Beijing.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Prognostic factors of in-hospital complications after hip fracture surgery: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  17. Long-term functional outcome after a low-energy hip fracture in elderly patients.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

P H S KalmetDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
B B KocDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard Geleen, the Netherlands.
B HemmesDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
R H M Ten BroekeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
G DekkersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, the Netherlands.
P HustinxDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
M G SchotanusDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard Geleen, the Netherlands.
P TilmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard Geleen, the Netherlands.
H M J JanzingDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands.
J M A VerkeynDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, St Jans Gasthuis, Weert, the Netherlands.
P R G BrinkDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M PoezeDepartment of Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway (MCP) for patients with hip fracture tends to be more effective than usual care (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an MCP approach on time to surgery, length of stay, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality, compared to UC. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients aged 50 years or older with a proximal hip fracture who underwent surgery in one of the 6 hospitals in the Limburg trauma region of the Netherlands in 2012. Data such as demographics, process outcome measures, and clinical outcome were collected.

resultsThis study included a total of 1193 patients (665 and 528 patients in the MCP and UC groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient demographics present. Time to surgery was significantly shorter in the MCP compared to the UC group (19.2 vs 24.4 hours, P < .01). The mean length of stay was 10 versus 12 days (P < .01). In the MCP group, significantly lower rates of postoperative complications were observed and significantly more patients were institutionalized than in the UC group. Mortality within 30 days after admission was comparable between the groups (overall mortality 6%).

conclusionAn MCP approach is associated with reduced time to surgery, postoperative complications, and length of stay, without a significant difference in 30-day mortality. The institutionalization rate was significantly higher in the MCP group.

Indexed as

hip fracturelength of staymortalitymultidisciplinary clinical pathwaytime to surgery

Identifiers

PMID27239381
PMCPMC4872184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.