Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27239102›Full record

ReviewMediators of inflammation2016

A Pathophysiological Insight into Sepsis and Its Correlation with Postmortem Diagnosis.

C Pomara, I Riezzo, S Bello, D De Carlo, M Neri, E Turillazzi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. MicroRNAs: An Update of Applications in Forensic Science.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The cause of death in bacterial meningitis.BMC infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C PomaraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, University of Foggia, Viale degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
I RiezzoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, University of Foggia, Viale degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
S BelloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, University of Foggia, Viale degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
D De CarloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, University of Foggia, Viale degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
M NeriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, University of Foggia, Viale degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
E TurillazziDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, Ospedale Colonnello D'Avanzo, University of Foggia, Viale degli Aviatori 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is among the leading causes of death worldwide and is the focus of a great deal of attention from policymakers and caregivers. However, sepsis poses significant challenges from a clinical point of view regarding its early detection and the best organization of sepsis care. Furthermore, we do not yet have reliable tools for measuring the incidence of sepsis. Methods based on analyses of insurance claims are unreliable, and postmortem diagnosis is still challenging since autopsy findings are often nonspecific.

aimThe objective of this review is to assess the state of our knowledge of the molecular and biohumoral mechanisms of sepsis and to correlate them with our postmortem diagnosis ability.

conclusionThe diagnosis of sepsis-related deaths is an illustrative example of the reciprocal value of autopsy both for clinicians and for pathologists. A complete methodological approach, integrating clinical data by means of autopsy and histological and laboratory findings aiming to identify and demonstrate the host response to infectious insults, is mandatory to illuminate the exact cause of death. This would help clinicians to compare pre- and postmortem findings and to reliably measure the incidence of sepsis.

Indexed as

DiagnosisCause of DeathHumansSepsis

Identifiers

PMID27239102
PMCPMC4863102
OpenAlexW2344473476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.