Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27238906›Full record

SynthesisTravel medicine and infectious disease

Methodologies for measuring travelers' risk perception of infectious diseases: A systematic review.

Shruti Sridhar, Isabelle Régner, Philippe Brouqui, Philippe Gautret

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Travel medicine and infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shruti SridharAix Marseille Université, Emerging Tropical and Infectious Disease Unit (URMITE), Faculty of Medicine, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France.
Isabelle RégnerAix Marseille Université, CNRS, LPC UMR 7290, 13331, Marseille, France.
Philippe BrouquiAix Marseille Université, Emerging Tropical and Infectious Disease Unit (URMITE), Faculty of Medicine, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Institut Méditerranée Infection, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Unit, North Hospital, Chemin des Bourrelys, 13915, Marseille, France.
Philippe GautretAix Marseille Université, Emerging Tropical and Infectious Disease Unit (URMITE), Faculty of Medicine, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Institut Méditerranée Infection, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Unit, North Hospital, Chemin des Bourrelys, 13915, Marseille, France. Electronic address: philippe.gautret@club-internet.fr.
Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FRAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies in the past have stressed the importance of travelers' psychology and perception in the implementation of preventive measures. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the methodologies used in studies reporting on travelers' risk perception of infectious diseases. A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. There were 39 studies identified. In 35 of 39 studies, the methodology used was that of a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey based on questionnaires. One study used a combination of questionnaires and a visual psychometric measuring instrument called the 'pictorial representation of illness and self-measurement" or PRISM. One study used a self-representation model (SRM) method. Two studies measured psychosocial factors. Valuable information was obtained from KAP surveys showing an overall lack of knowledge among travelers about the most frequent travel-associated infections and associated preventive measures. This methodological approach however, is mainly descriptive, addressing knowledge, attitudes, and practices separately and lacking an examination of the interrelationships between these three components. Another limitation of the KAP method is underestimating psychosocial variables that have proved influential in health related behaviors, including perceived benefits and costs of preventive measures, perceived social pressure, perceived personal control, unrealistic optimism and risk propensity. Future risk perception studies in travel medicine should consider psychosocial variables with inferential and multivariate statistical analyses. The use of implicit measurements of attitudes could also provide new insights in the field of travelers' risk perception of travel-associated infectious diseases.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesAdultCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePerceptionRiskSurveys and QuestionnairesTravelInfectious diseasesMethodologyRisk perceptionTraveler

Identifiers

PMID27238906
PMCPMC7110652
OpenAlexW2417348260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.