Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27238897›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

Which way and how far? Tracking of translation and rotation information for human path integration.

Elizabeth R Chrastil, Katherine R Sherrill, Michael E Hasselmo, Chantal E Stern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Theta Activity Supports Landmark-Based Correction of Naturalistic Human Path Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Disentangling reference frames in the neural compass.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Linking global top-down views to first-person views in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Sensory Evidence Accumulation Using Optic Flow in a Naturalistic Navigation Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth R ChrastilDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Katherine R SherrillDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael E HasselmoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chantal E SternDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

ULTRAHIGH FIELD TECHNOLOGY FOR FUNCTIONAL IMAGINGP41RR014075 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 1999 to 2011
$16.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR014075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Path integration, the constant updating of the navigator's knowledge of position and orientation during movement, requires both visuospatial knowledge and memory. This study aimed to develop a systems-level understanding of human path integration by examining the basic building blocks of path integration in humans. To achieve this goal, we used functional imaging to examine the neural mechanisms that support the tracking and memory of translational and rotational components of human path integration. Critically, and in contrast to previous studies, we examined movement in translation and rotation tasks with no defined end-point or goal. Navigators accumulated translational and rotational information during virtual self-motion. Activity in hippocampus, retrosplenial cortex (RSC), and parahippocampal cortex (PHC) increased during both translation and rotation encoding, suggesting that these regions track self-motion information during path integration. These results address current questions regarding distance coding in the human brain. By implementing a modified delayed match to sample paradigm, we also examined the encoding and maintenance of path integration signals in working memory. Hippocampus, PHC, and RSC were recruited during successful encoding and maintenance of path integration information, with RSC selective for tasks that required processing heading rotation changes. These data indicate distinct working memory mechanisms for translation and rotation, which are essential for updating neural representations of current location. The results provide evidence that hippocampus, PHC, and RSC flexibly track task-relevant translation and rotation signals for path integration and could form the hub of a more distributed network supporting spatial navigation. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3636-3655, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeRotationSelf ConceptSpace PerceptionSpatial NavigationTime FactorsVideo Recordingfunctional magnetic resonance imaginghippocampusnavigationparahippocampusretrosplenial cortexworking memory

Identifiers

PMID27238897
PMCPMC6867382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.