Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27238845›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016

Determining Which Phenotypes Underlie a Pleiotropic Signal.

Arunabha Majumdar, Tanushree Haldar, John S Witte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Statistical Impact of Sample Size and Imbalance on Multivariate AnalysisAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arunabha MajumdarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
Tanushree HaldarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
John S WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.

Funding

Targeting FOXA1-downstream pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancerP50CA180995 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ABDULKADIR, SARKI A., HUSSAIN, MAHA H · 2015 to 2025
$19.9M
Training in Molecular& Genetic Epidemiology of CancerR25CA112355 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WITTE, JOHN S. · 2005 to 2018
$6.5M
Genetic Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer Risk and ProgressionR01CA088164 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VAN DEN EEDEN, STEPHEN K., WITTE, JOHN S. · 2000 to 2015
$6.1M
Genomewide Association Study of Prostate CancerU01CA127298 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WITTE, JOHN S. · 2008 to 2012
$5.1M
Genome-wide Pleiotropy Scan across Multiple CancersR01CA201358 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRAFF, REBECCA ELIZABETH, SAKODA, LORI · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
Lifespan Psychosocial Profiles and Biological Pathways to Bone StrengthR01AG033067 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CRANDALL, CAROLYN JANET, KARLAMANGLA, ARUN S · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180995NCI NIH HHS R01 CA088164NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201358NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112355NCI NIH HHS U01 CA127298NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering pleiotropic loci is important to understand the biological basis of seemingly distinct phenotypes. Most methods for assessing pleiotropy only test for the overall association between genetic variants and multiple phenotypes. To determine which specific traits are pleiotropic, we evaluate via simulation and application three different strategies. The first is model selection techniques based on the inverse regression of genotype on phenotypes. The second is a subset-based meta analysis ASSET [Bhattacharjee et al., ], which provides an optimal subset of nonnull traits. And the third is a modified Benjamini-Hochberg (B-H) procedure of controlling the expected false discovery rate [Benjamini and Hochberg, ] in the framework of phenome-wide association study. From our simulations we see that an inverse regression-based approach MultiPhen [O'Reilly et al., ] is more powerful than ASSET for detecting overall pleiotropic association, except for when all the phenotypes are associated and have genetic effects in the same direction. For determining which specific traits are pleiotropic, the modified B-H procedure performs consistently better than the other two methods. The inverse regression-based selection methods perform competitively with the modified B-H procedure only when the phenotypes are weakly correlated. The efficiency of ASSET is observed to lie below and in between the efficiency of the other two methods when the traits are weakly and strongly correlated, respectively. In our application to a large GWAS, we find that the modified B-H procedure also performs well, indicating that this may be an optimal approach for determining the traits underlying a pleiotropic signal.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyAdultAgingCohort StudiesComputer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableSoftwaremultiple phenotypesmultivariate associationnonnull traitspleiotropyselection

Identifiers

PMID27238845
PMCPMC4929010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.