Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27238606›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2016

Initial Testing (Stage 1) of MK-8242-A Novel MDM2 Inhibitor-by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program.

Min H Kang, C Patrick Reynolds, E Anders Kolb, Richard Gorlick, Hernan Carol, Richard Lock, Stephen T Keir, John M Maris, Jianwrong Wu, Dmitry Lyalin and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Development of MDM2-Targeting PROTAC for Advancing Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Therapeutic Strategies to Activate p53.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Min H KangCancer Center, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
C Patrick ReynoldsCancer Center, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
E Anders KolbA.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware.
Richard GorlickThe Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York.
Hernan CarolChildren's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Richard LockChildren's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Stephen T KeirDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
John M MarisChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jianwrong WuSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Dmitry LyalinNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Raushan T KurmashevaNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Peter J HoughtonNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Malcolm A SmithCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USChildren's Cancer Institute Australia · AUCenter for Cancer Research · USChildren's Hospital at Montefiore · USCommunity Health Systems - Dupont Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USTexas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
TEMODAR RESISTANCE IN CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMP50CA108786 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 2004 to 2009
$12.3M
Pediatric Preclinical Testing Consortium: Research Programs Non-CNS (U01)U01CA199297 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HOUGHTON, PETER J · 2015 to 2021
$3.5M
ANTINEOPLASTIC ALKYLGLYCEROLIPIDSR01CA042216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PIANTADOSI, CLAUDE · 1988 to 1990
–
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000001CNCI NIH HHS N01 CM042216NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108786NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMK-8242 is an inhibitor of MDM2 that stabilizes the tumor suppressor TP53 and induces growth arrest or apoptosis downstream of TP53 induction. PROCEDURES: MK-8242 was tested against the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) in vitro cell line panel at concentrations from 1.0 nM to 10.0 μM and against the PPTP in vivo xenograft panels using oral gavage on Days 1-5 and Day 15-19 at a dose of 125 mg/kg (solid tumors) or 75 mg/kg (acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL] models).

resultsThe median IC50 for MK-8242 was 0.07 μM for TP53 wild-type cell lines versus >10 μM for TP53 mutant cell lines. MK-8242 induced a twofold or greater delay in time to event in 10 of 17 (59%) of TP53 wild-type solid tumor xenografts, excluding osteosarcoma xenografts that have very low TP53 expression. Objective responses were observed in seven solid tumor xenografts representing multiple histotypes. For the systemic-disease ALL panel, among eight xenografts there were two complete responses (CRs) and six partial responses (PRs). Two additional MLL-rearranged xenografts (MV4;11 and RS4;11) grown subcutaneously showed maintained CR and PR, respectively. The expected pharmacodynamic responses to TP53 activation were observed in TP53 wild-type models treated with MK-8242. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that MK-8242 drug exposure in SCID mice appears to exceed that was observed in adult phase 1 trials.

conclusionsMK-8242-induced tumor regressions across multiple solid tumor histotypes and induced CRs or PRs for most ALL xenografts. This activity was observed at MK-8242 drug exposures that appear to exceed those observed in human phase 1 trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorChildCytarabineDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGenes, p53HumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsCytarabineProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2developmental therapeuticspi3k inhibitorpreclinical testing

Identifiers

PMID27238606
PMCPMC5657425
OpenAlexW2413234814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.