Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27237587›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2016

DNA repair by RNA: Templated, or not templated, that is the question.

Chance Meers, Havva Keskin, Francesca Storici

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multifaceted Nature of DNA Polymerase θ.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Emerging roles of RNA modifications in genome integrity.Briefings in functional genomics · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chance MeersSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Havva KeskinSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Francesca StoriciSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. Electronic address: storici@gatech.edu.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

RNA-mediated DNA break repairR01GM115927 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STORICI, FRANCESCA · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells are continuously exposed to both endogenous and exogenous sources of genomic stress. To maintain chromosome stability, a variety of mechanisms have evolved to cope with the multitude of genetic abnormalities that can arise over the life of a cell. Still, failures to repair these lesions are the driving force of cancers and other degenerative disorders. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most toxic genetic lesions, inhibiting cell ability to replicate, and are sites of mutations and chromosomal rearrangements. DSB repair is known to proceed via two major mechanisms: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR reliance on the exchange of genetic information between two identical or nearly identical DNA molecules offers increased accuracy. While the preferred substrate for HR in mitotic cells is the sister chromatid, this is limited to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. However, abundant amounts of homologous genetic substrate may exist throughout the cell cycle in the form of RNA. Considered an uncommon occurrence, the direct transfer of information from RNA to DNA is thought to be limited to special circumstances. Studies have shown that RNA molecules reverse transcribed into cDNA can be incorporated into DNA at DSB sites via a non-templated mechanism by NHEJ or a templated mechanism by HR. In addition, synthetic RNA molecules can directly template the repair of DSBs in yeast and human cells via an HR mechanism. New work suggests that even endogenous transcript RNA can serve as a homologous template to repair a DSB in chromosomal DNA. In this perspective, we will review and discuss the recent advancements in DSB repair by RNA via non-templated and templated mechanisms. We will provide current findings, models and future challenges investigating RNA and its role in DSB repair.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairRecombinational DNA RepairDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, ComplementaryHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRetroelementsReverse TranscriptionRibonuclease HRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNADNA, ComplementaryRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRetroelementsRibonuclease HRNA, MessengercDNACentral dogmaDouble-strand break repairHomologous recombinationLINE-1NHEJRad52RetrotransposonReverse transcriptionRNase HRNA-templated DNA repair

Identifiers

PMID27237587
PMCPMC4958532
OpenAlexW2394891736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.