Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27236823›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2016

This bud's for you: mechanisms of cellular nucleocytoplasmic trafficking via nuclear envelope budding.

Lee G Fradkin, Vivian Budnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Nuclear envelope budding: Getting large macromolecular complexes out of the nucleus.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Nuclear envelope budding is a response to cellular stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Nuclear Egress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Journal of cell science · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Integration of mRNP formation and export.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Myosin-driven transport network in plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lee G FradkinDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation St, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Vivian BudnikDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation St, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Electronic address: Vivian.budnik@umassmed.edu.

Funding

The Frizzled Nuclear Import Pathway in Synapse DevelopmentR01NS063228 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BUDNIK, VIVIAN G. · 2010 to 2017
$2.4M
Nuclear export of RNAs by nuclear envelope buddingR01NS085993 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BUDNIK, VIVIAN G. · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
The Frizzled Nuclear Import Pathway in Synapse DevelopmentR56NS063228 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BUDNIK, VIVIAN G. · 2013 to 2013
$416k
UltramicrotomeS10OD021580 · OD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HENDRICKS, GREGORY · 2016 to 2016
$53k
NIH HHS S10 OD021580NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063228NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085993NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS063228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear envelope (NE) physically separates the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments. While this barrier provides advantages, it also presents a challenge for the nuclear export of large ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. Decades-old dogma holds that all such border-crossing is via the nuclear pore complex (NPC). However, the diameter of the NPC central channel limits the passage of large cargos. Here, we review evidence that such large RNPs employ an endogenous NE-budding pathway, previously thought to be exclusive to the nuclear egress of Herpes viruses. We discuss this and other models proposed, the likelihood that this pathway is conserved, and the consequences of disrupting NE-budding for synapse development, localized translation of synaptic mRNAs, and laminopathies inducing accelerated aging.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsHerpesviridaeHumansModels, BiologicalNuclear EnvelopeNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsRibonucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID27236823
PMCPMC5019485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.