Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27236438›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2017

Genetic differences stratified by PCR-based microsatellite analysis in gastric intramucosal neoplasia.

Tamotsu Sugai, Ryo Sugimoto, Wataru Habano, Masaki Endoh, Makoto Eizuka, Koudai Tsuchida, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Keisuke Kawasaki, Syunichi Yanai, Takayuki Matsumoto and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The molecular profile of gastric intraepithelial foveolar type neoplasia based on somatic copy number alterations and multiple mutation analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular alterations in gastric cancer and the surrounding intestinal metaplastic mucosa: an analysis of isolated glands.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The clinicopathological and molecular features of sporadic gastric foveolar type neoplasia.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular profiling and comprehensive genome-wide analysis of somatic copy number alterations in gastric intramucosal neoplasias based on microsatellite status.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tamotsu SugaiDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan. tsugai@cocoa.ocn.ne.jp.
Ryo SugimotoDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Wataru HabanoDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Genetics, School of Pharmacy, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Masaki EndohDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Makoto EizukaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Koudai TsuchidaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Eiichiro YamamotoDepartment of Molecular Biology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Keisuke KawasakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Syunichi YanaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Takayuki MatsumotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Hiromu SuzukiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Iwate Medical University · JPSapporo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough genetic alterations in patients with advanced gastric cancer have been extensively studied, those in patients with intramucosal neoplasia (IMN) are still poorly understood.

methodsWe evaluated genetic differences in 158 IMNs, including 51 low-grade dysplasias, 58 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), 30 intramucosal cancers (IMCs), and 19 mixed tumors (composed of IMC and HGD within the same tumor), using PCR-based microsatellite analysis [allelic imbalance (AI) and microsatellite instability (MSI)]. We classified the DNA methylation status as a hypermethylated epigenome, a moderately methylated epigenome, or a hypomethylated epigenome. In addition, p53 overexpression, β-catenin nuclear localization, and mucin expression were also examined.

resultsFrom cluster analysis, the IMNs examined were categorized into four subgroups as follows. Tumors in subgroup 1 were characterized by MSI-high status, a hypermethylated epigenome, and loss or reduction of expression of MLH-1. Tumors in subgroup 2 showed a mixed pattern consisting of AI and MSI. In contrast, tumors in subgroup 3, which showed accumulation of multiple AIs, were closely associated with HGD, IMC, or mixed tumor and exhibited nuclear expression of β-catenin. Tumors in subgroup 4, which were generally low-grade dysplasias, exhibited a low frequency of AIs and no MSI. Although the mucin phenotype was not correlated with any subgroup, expression of mucin was associated with some subgroups. Overexpression of p53 was common in all subgroups.

conclusionThe approach described herein was useful for studying genetic differences in IMNs. In addition, we suggest that stratification of genetic differences may help to identify genetic molecular profiles in IMNs.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationMicrosatellite InstabilityAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric MucosaHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorAllelic imbalanceCluster analysisEarly gastric cancerMethylationMicrosatellite instability

Identifiers

PMID27236438
OpenAlexW2401931799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.