Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27236333›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2016

Clinical results of mean GTV dose optimized robotic guided SBRT for liver metastases.

Nicolaus Andratschke, Alan Parys, Susanne Stadtfeld, Stefan Wurster, Stefan Huttenlocher, Detlef Imhoff, Müjdat Yildirim, Dirk Rades, Claus Michael Rödel, Jürgen Dunst and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tumor-dose-rate variations during robotic radiosurgery of oligo and multiple brain metastases.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Under-reported dosimetry errors due to interplay effects during VMAT dose delivery in extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
  10. Direct dose correlation of MRI morphologic alterations of healthy liver tissue after robotic liver SBRT.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Breathing-motion-compensated robotic guided stereotactic body radiation therapy : Patterns of failure analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spatiotemporal fractionation schemes for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2017
    Article
  16. Planning benchmark study for SBRT of early stage NSCLC : Results of the DEGRO Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany. nicolaus.andratschke@usz.ch.
Alan ParysDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Susanne StadtfeldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Stefan WursterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Stefan HuttenlocherSaphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Güstrow, Germany.
Detlef ImhoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Müjdat YildirimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Dirk RadesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Claus Michael RödelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jürgen DunstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Guido HildebrandtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Oliver BlanckSaphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Güstrow, Germany.
SAPHIR Radiochirurgie · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DECopenhagen University Hospital · DKGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gross tumor volume (GTV) mean-dose-optimized and real-time motion-compensated robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of liver metastases.

methodsBetween March 2011 and July 2015, 52 patients were treated with SBRT for a total of 91 liver metastases (one to four metastases per patient) with a median GTV volume of 12 cc (min 1 cc, max 372 cc). The optimization of mean GTV dose was prioritized during treatment planning at the potential cost of planning target volume (PTV) coverage reduction while adhering to safe normal tissue constraints. The delivered median GTV biological effective dose (BED10) was 142.1 Gy10 (range, 60.2 Gy10 -165.3 Gy10) and the prescribed PTV BED10 ranged from 40.6 Gy10 to 112.5 Gy10 (median, 86.1 Gy10). We analyzed local control (LC), progression-free interval (PFI), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

resultsMedian follow-up was 17 months (range, 2-49 months). The 2-year actuarial LC, PFI, and OS rates were 82.1, 17.7, and 45.0 %, and the median PFI and OS were 9 and 23 months, respectively. In univariate analysis histology (p < 0.001), PTV prescription BED10 (HR 0.95, CI 0.91-0.98, p = 0.002) and GTV mean BED10 (HR 0.975, CI 0.954-0.996, p = 0.011) were predictive for LC. Multivariate analysis showed that only extrahepatic disease status at time of treatment was a significant factor (p = 0.033 and p = 0.009, respectively) for PFI and OS. Acute nausea or fatigue grade 1 was observed in 24.1 % of the patients and only 1 patient (1.9 %) had a side effect of grade ≥ 2.

conclusionsRobotic real-time motion-compensated SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for one to four liver metastases. Reducing the PTV prescription dose and keeping a high mean GTV dose allowed the reduction of toxicity while maintaining a high local control probability for the treated lesions.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryRoboticsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesSurgery, Computer-AssistedCyberKnife robotic radiosurgeryGross tumor volume optimizationLiver metastasesStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID27236333
PMCPMC4884398
OpenAlexW2401955414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.