Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27236330›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2016

Perspectives of frontline health workers on Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme before and after community engagement interventions.

Robert Kaba Alhassan, Edward Nketiah-Amponsah, Nicole Spieker, Daniel Kojo Arhinful, Tobias F Rinke de Wit

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert Kaba AlhassanDepartment of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana. arkabason@gmail.com.
Edward Nketiah-AmponsahDepartment of Economics, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Nicole SpiekerPharmAccess Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Daniel Kojo ArhinfulDepartment of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Tobias F Rinke de WitPharmAccess Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarely a decade after introduction of Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), significant successes have been recorded in universal access to basic healthcare services. However, sustainability of the scheme is increasingly threatened by concerns on quality of health service delivery in NHIS-accredited health facilities coupled with stakeholders' discontentment with the operational and administrative challenges confronting the NHIS. The study sought to ascertain whether or not Systematic Community Engagement (SCE) interventions have a significant effect on frontline health workers' perspectives on the NHIS and its impact on quality health service delivery.

methodsThe study is a randomized cluster trial involving clinical and non-clinical frontline health workers (n = 234) interviewed at baseline and follow-up in the Greater Accra and Western regions of Ghana. Individual respondents were chosen from within each intervention and control groupings. Difference-in-difference estimations and propensity score matching were performed to determine impact of SCE on staff perceptions of the NHIS. The main outcome measure of interest was staff perception of the NHIS based on eight (8) factor-analyzed quality service parameters.

resultsStaff interviewed in intervention facilities appeared to perceive the NHIS more positively in terms of its impact on "availability and quality of drugs (p < 0.05)" and "workload on health staff/infrastructure" than those interviewed in control facilities (p < 0.1). Delayed reimbursement of service providers remained a key concern to over 70 % of respondents in control and intervention health facilities.

conclusionCommunity engagement in quality service assessment is a potential useful strategy towards empowering communities while promoting frontline health workers' interest, goodwill and active participation in Ghana's NHIS.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCluster AnalysisDelivery of Health CareFemaleGhanaHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHumansInsurance, HealthMaleNational Health ProgramsPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesFrontline health workersGhanaNational Health Insurance SchemePerspectivesQuality serviceSystematic community engagement interventions

Identifiers

PMID27236330
PMCPMC4884385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.