Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27236290›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Cholangitis in the postoperative course after biliodigestive anastomosis.

Sebastian Cammann, Kai Timrott, Ralf-Peter Vonberg, Florian W R Vondran, Harald Schrem, Sebastian Suerbaum, Jürgen Klempnauer, Hüseyin Bektas, Moritz Kleine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Duct-To-Duct Biliary Anastomosis with Removable Internal Biliary Stent During Major Hepatectomy Extended to the Biliary Confluence.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian CammannGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany. cammann.sebastian@mh-hannover.de.
Kai TimrottGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Ralf-Peter VonbergInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Florian W R VondranGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Harald SchremCore Facility Quality Management and Health Technology Assessment in Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Sebastian SuerbaumInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Jürgen KlempnauerGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Hüseyin BektasGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Moritz KleineGeneral, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatobiliary surgery with biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) results in a loss of the sphincter of Oddi with consecutive ascension of bacteria into the bile system which may cause cholangitis in the postoperative course.

methodsPatients who received reconstruction with a BDA after hepatobiliary surgery were analyzed retrospectively for their postoperative course of disease depending on intraoperatively obtained bile cultures and antibiotic prophylaxis.

resultsTwo hundred forty-three patients were included in the analysis, 49.4 % of whom had received endoscopic stenting before the operation. Stenting was significantly associated with the presence of drug-resistant bacteria in the intraoperatively obtained bile sample (p < 0.001, OR = 4.09). Of all patients, 14.4 % developed postoperative cholangitis. This was significantly associated with the postoperative length of stay in the intensive care unit (p = 0.002, OR = 1.035). The highest incidence of postoperative cholangitis was found in patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 12, p = 0.046, OR = 2.178). Patients were more likely to harbor strains with resistance against the antibiotic that was given intraoperatively.

conclusionThe risk for the presence of drug-resistant bacteria is increased by preoperative stenting of the common bile duct. Bile culture by intraoperative swabs can be altered by the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis as it induces microbiological selection in the common bile duct.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalAntibiotic ProphylaxisBileBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangitisDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsAntibiotic treatmentBile duct cancerBiliodigestive anastomosisPancreatic carcinomaPostoperative cholangitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.