Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27235932›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2016

hESC-derived neural progenitors prevent xenograft rejection through neonatal desensitisation.

Andreas Heuer, Agnete Kirkeby, Ulrich Pfisterer, Marie E Jönsson, Malin Parmar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05635409 (STEM-PD Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05635409 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

STEM-PD Trial: A Multicentre, Single Arm, First in Human, Dose-escalation Trial, Investigating the Safety and Tolerability of Intraputamenal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Dopaminergic Cells for Parkinson's Disease (STEM-PD Product)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2022 to 2027Enrolled8ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsSTEM-PD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas HeuerDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Agnete KirkebyDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Human Neural Development, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulrich PfistererDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Marie E JönssonDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Malin ParmarDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: malin.parmar@med.lu.se.

Funding

European Research Council 309712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell therapies for neurological disorders are rapidly moving towards use in clinical trials. Before initiation of clinical trials, extensive pre-clinical validation in appropriate animal models is essential. However, grafts of human cells into the rodent brain are rejected within weeks after transplantation and the standard methods of immune-suppression for the purpose of studying human xenografts are not always sufficient for the long-term studies needed for transplanted human neurons to maturate, integrate and provide functional benefits in the host brain. Neonatal injections in rat pups using human fetal brain cells have been shown to desensitise the host to accept human tissue grafts as adults, whilst not compromising their immune system. Here, we show that differentiated human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can be used for desensitisation to achieve long-term graft survival of human stem cell-derived neurons in a xenograft setting, surpassing the time of conventional pharmacological immune-suppressive treatments. The use of hESCs for desensitisation opens up for a widespread use of the technique, which will be of great value when performing pre-clinical evaluation of stem cell-derived neurons in animal models.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntigens, CDBlood-Brain BarrierBrain InjuriesCell Line, TransformedCyclosporineDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGraft RejectionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsNerve Tissue ProteinsAntigens, CDCyclosporineGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImmunosuppressive AgentsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesOxidopamineSympatholyticsCyclosporineDesensitisationhESCImmune responseRejectionStem cellTransplantXenograft

Identifiers

PMID27235932
PMCPMC4920671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.