Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27235443›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Population Genetic Structure of Listeria monocytogenes Strains as Determined by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Multilocus Sequence Typing.

Clémentine Henri, Benjamin Félix, Laurent Guillier, Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon, Damien Michelon, Jean-François Mariet, Frank M Aarestrup, Michel-Yves Mistou, René S Hendriksen, Sophie Roussel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic analysis ofFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surveillance and genetic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization and Antibiotic Resistance ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. The Prevalence and Antibiotic-Resistant ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Genetic Diversity and Potential Virulence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Food science & nutrition · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Novel Sequence Types ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clémentine HenriUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Benjamin FélixUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Laurent GuillierUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Pimlapas LeekitcharoenphonTechnical University of Denmark, National Food Institute, WHO Collaborating Center for Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens and European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Damien MichelonUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Jean-François MarietUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Frank M AarestrupTechnical University of Denmark, National Food Institute, WHO Collaborating Center for Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens and European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Michel-Yves MistouUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France.
René S HendriksenTechnical University of Denmark, National Food Institute, WHO Collaborating Center for Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Pathogens and European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Sophie RousselUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France sophie.roussel@anses.fr.
Technical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledListeria monocytogenes is a ubiquitous bacterium that may cause the foodborne illness listeriosis. Only a small amount of data about the population genetic structure of strains isolated from food is available. This study aimed to provide an accurate view of the L. monocytogenes food strain population in France. From 1999 to 2014, 1,894 L. monocytogenes strains were isolated from food at the French National Reference Laboratory for L. monocytogenes and classified according to the five risk food matrices defined by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). A total of 396 strains were selected on the basis of different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) clusters, serotypes, and strain origins and typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and the MLST results were supplemented with MLST data available from Institut Pasteur, representing human and additional food strains from France. The distribution of sequence types (STs) was compared between food and clinical strains on a panel of 675 strains. High congruence between PFGE and MLST was found. Out of 73 PFGE clusters, the two most prevalent corresponded to ST9 and ST121. Using original statistical analysis, we demonstrated that (i) there was not a clear association between ST9 and ST121 and the food matrices, (ii) serotype IIc, ST8, and ST4 were associated with meat products, and (iii) ST13 was associated with dairy products. Of the two major STs, ST121 was the ST that included the fewest clinical strains, which might indicate lower virulence. This observation may be directly relevant for refining risk analysis models for the better management of food safety. IMPORTANCE: This study showed a very useful backward compatibility between PFGE and MLST for surveillance. The results enabled better understanding of the population structure of L. monocytogenes strains isolated from food and management of the health risks associated with L. monocytogenes food strains. Moreover, this work provided an accurate view of L. monocytogenes strain populations associated with specific food matrices. We clearly showed that some STs were associated with food matrices, such as meat, meat products, and dairy products. We opened the way to source attribution modeling in order to quantify the relative importance of the main food matrices.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFood MicrobiologyGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationMultilocus Sequence TypingCluster AnalysisFranceHumansListeria monocytogenesListeriosisSerotyping

Identifiers

PMID27235443
PMCPMC5007763
OpenAlexW2395676059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.