ArticleMolecular human reproduction2016
The study of progesterone action in human myometrial explants.
Article in Molecular human reproduction, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Ex Vivo Model for the Onset of Human Labor.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- A bioprinted model of pregnant human uterine myometrium.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Evaluating aminophylline and progesterone combination treatment to modulate contractility and labor-related proteins in pregnant human myometrial tissues.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Article
- Transcriptional control of parturition: insights from gene regulation studies in the myometrium.Molecular human reproduction · 2021Review
- Variable Responsiveness to Agonists for TLR2 and TLR7 in Myometrial Cells from Different Sources: Correlation with Receptor Expression.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2020Article
- Progesterone Receptor Signaling Selectively Modulates Cytokine-Induced Global Gene Expression in Human Cervical Stromal Cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- The interaction between protein kinase A and progesterone on basal and inflammation-induced myometrial oxytocin receptor expression.PloS one · 2020Article
- Cooperative effects of sequential PGF2α and IL-1β on IL-6 and COX-2 expression in human myometrial cells†.Biology of reproduction · 2019Article
- Steroids, Pregnancy and Fetal Development.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Inflammatory Stimuli Increase Progesterone Receptor-A Stability and Transrepressive Activity in Myometrial Cells.Endocrinology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study hypothesisMyometrial explants represent a superior model compared with cell culture models for the study of human myometrial progesterone (P4) signalling in parturition. STUDY FINDING: Gene expression analysis showed myometrial explants closely resemble the in vivo condition and the anti-inflammatory action of P4 is not lost with labour onset. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Circulating P4 levels decline before the onset of parturition in most animals, but not in humans. This has led to the suggestion that there is a functional withdrawal of P4 action at the myometrial level prior to labour onset. However, to date, no evidence of a loss of P4 function has been provided, with studies hampered by a lack of a physiologically relevant model. STUDY DESIGN, SAMPLES/MATERIALS,
methodsMyometrial biopsies obtained at Caesarean section were dissected into explants after a portion was immediately snap frozen (t = 0). Microarray analysis was used to compare gene expression of t = 0 with paired (i) explants, (ii) passage 4 myometrial cell cultures or (iii) the hTERT myometrial cell line. Western blotting and chemokine/cytokine assays were used to study P4 signalling in myometrial explants. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Gene expression comparison of t = 0 to the three models demonstrated that explants more closely resemble the in vivo status. At the protein level, explants maintain both P4 receptor (PR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels versus t = 0 whereas cells only maintain GR levels. Additionally, treatment with 1 µM P4 led to a reduction in interleukin-1 (IL-1) β-driven cyclooxygenase-2 in explants but not in cells. P4 signalling in explants was PR-mediated and associated with a repression of p65 and c-Jun phosphorylation. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory action of P4 was maintained after labour onset. LIMITATIONS/REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is evidence of basal inflammation in the myometrial explant model. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsMyometrial explants constitute a novel model to study P4 signalling in the myometrium and can be used to further elucidate the mechanisms of P4 action in human labour. LARGE SCALE DATA: Data deposited at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=gvmpggkurbgxfqf&acc=GSE77830. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST: This work was supported by grants from the Joint Research Committee of the Westminster Medical School Research Trust, Borne (No. 1067412-7; a sub-charity of the Chelsea and Westminster Health Charity) and the Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS or the Department of Health. The authors have no conflict of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.