Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27234972›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Encouraging impact following 2.5 years of reinforced malaria control interventions in a hyperendemic region of the Republic of Guinea.

Amanda Tiffany, Faya Pascal Moundekeno, Alexis Traoré, Melat Haile, Esther Sterk, Timothée Guilavogui, Blaise Genton, Micaela Serafini, Rebecca F Grais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. NovelWellcome open research · 2018
    Article
  4. TheeLife · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanda TiffanyEpicentre, Geneva, Switzerland. amanda.tiffany@geneva.msf.org.
Faya Pascal MoundekenoMédecins Sans Frontières, Guéckédou, Guinea.
Alexis TraoréDistrict Préfectoral de la Santé, Guéckédou, Guinea.
Melat HaileMédecins Sans Frontières, Conakry, Guinea.
Esther SterkMédecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland.
Timothée GuilavoguiNational Malaria Control Programme, Conakry, Guinea.
Blaise GentonSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Micaela SerafiniMédecins Sans Frontières, Guéckédou, Guinea.
Rebecca F GraisEpicentre, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is one of the principal causes of morbidity and mortality in the Republic of Guinea, particularly in the highly endemic regions. To assist in malaria control efforts, a multi-component malaria control intervention was implemented in the hyperendemic region of Guéckédou Prefecture. The coverage of the intervention and its impact on malaria parasite prevalence were assessed.

methodsFive cross-sectional surveys using cluster-based sampling and stratified by area were conducted from 2011 to 2013 in three sous-préfectures of Guéckédou Préfecture that received the intervention: Guéckédou City, Tékoulo and Guendembou in addition to one comparison sous-préfecture that did not receive the intervention, Koundou. Surveys were repeated every 6 months, corresponding with the dry and rainy seasons. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) were used to diagnose malaria infection. In each selected household, bed net use and ownership were assessed.

resultsA total of 35,123 individuals participated in the surveys. Malaria parasite prevalence declined in all intervention sous-préfectures from 2011 to 2013 (56.4-45.9 % in Guéckédou City, 64.9-54.1 % in Tékoulo and 69.4-56.9 % in Guendembou) while increasing in the comparison sous-préfecture (64.5-69 %). It was consistently higher in children 5-14 years of age followed by those 1-59 months and ≥15 years. Indicators of intervention coverage, the proportion of households reporting ownership of at least one bed net and the proportion of survey participants with fever who received treatment from a health facility or community health worker also increased significantly in the intervention areas.

conclusionsImplementation of the multi-component malaria control intervention significantly reduced the prevalence of malaria in the sous-préfectures of intervention while also increasing the coverage of bed nets. However, malaria prevalence remains unacceptably high and disproportionately affects children <15 years of age. In such situations additional vector control interventions and age specific interventions should be considered.

Indexed as

Endemic DiseasesHealth Services ResearchAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleGuineaHumansInfantCross sectional surveysGuineaHyperendemicMalariaPlasmodium falciparumPrevalenceSymptomatic

Identifiers

PMID27234972
PMCPMC4884386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.