Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27234642›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

The time to progression ratio: a new individualized volumetric parameter for the early detection of clinical benefit of targeted therapies.

G A Cirkel, F Weeber, S Bins, C G M Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk, E van Werkhoven, S M Willems, M van Stralen, W B Veldhuis, I Ubink, N Steeghs and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01566279 (A Two Parts, Biomarker Study to Identify Genetic Aberrations Predictive for Response on Everolimus in Solid Tumors Without Regular Treatment Options), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01566279 nacompletednot on this map

A Two Parts, Biomarker Study to Identify Genetic Aberrations Predictive for Response on Everolimus in Solid Tumors Without Regular Treatment Options (CPCT-03)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2012 to 2016Enrolled73ConditionsUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificArmsEverolimus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On precision dosing of oral small molecule drugs in oncology.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  9. Clinical endpoints in oncology - a primer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G A CirkelCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht.
F WeeberCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Molecular Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
S BinsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam.
C G M Gadellaa-van HooijdonkCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
E van WerkhovenDepartment of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
S M WillemsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
M van StralenImage Sciences Institute.
W B VeldhuisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.
I UbinkDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht.
N SteeghsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
M J de JongeCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam.
M H G LangenbergCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht.
J H M SchellensCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam Department of Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S SleijferCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam.
M P LolkemaCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam.
E E VoestCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT) Department of Molecular Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam e.voest@nki.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly signs of efficacy are critical in drug development. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are commonly used to determine the efficacy of anti-cancer therapy in clinical trials. RECIST, however, emphasizes the value of tumor shrinkage, while many targeted agents induce prolonged tumor growth arrest. This limits its use for the detection of treatment efficacy for these more cytostatic regimens. Therefore, we designed an individualized variant of a time to progression (TTP) end point based on prospective volumetric measurements and an intra-patient control, the TTP ratio. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with any metastatic malignancy, without regular treatment options, were treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Treatment response was determined using both RECIST and the TTP ratio. The TTP ratio was defined as the volumetric pretreatment TTP divided by the volumetric on-treatment TTP. A patient was classified as a responder if the TTP ratio was <0.7. Consistency and reproducibility of volumetric measurements were determined.

resultsSeventy-three patients were included of whom 59 started treatment. A TTP ratio could be established in 73% (n = 43) of the treated patients. The inter-observer agreement for volumetric progression was 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.87) (Krippendorff's α-coefficient). According to RECIST, 35 patients (59%) had stable disease (SD) and 1 patient demonstrated a partial response (PR), whereas only 21 patients (36%) met the prespecified criteria for treatment efficacy according to the TTP ratio. Treatment response according to both the TTP ratio and RECIST (SD + PR) correlated with overall survival (OS) [P(log-rank) < 0.001]. The TTP ratio, however, was also able to differentiate which patients had a better OS within the RECIST SD group [P(log-rank) = 0.0496].

conclusionThe TTP ratio had a high inter-observer agreement, correlated with OS and identified which patients within the RECIST SD group had a longer OS. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01566279.

Indexed as

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionEverolimusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeEverolimusProtein Kinase Inhibitorsclinical trial end pointefficacyRECIST 1.1time to progression ratio

Identifiers

PMID27234642
OpenAlexW2398590827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.