Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27234212›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016

Public/community engagement in health research with men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities.

Sassy Molyneux, Salla Sariola, Dan Allman, Maartje Dijkstra, Evans Gichuru, Susan Graham, Dorcas Kamuya, Gloria Gakii, Brian Kayemba, Bernadette Kombo and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2022
    Article
  4. Using online spaces to recruit Kenyan queer womxn and trans men in restrictive offline settings.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stroke Investigative Research and Education Network: Public Outreach and Engagement.Journal of community medicine & health education · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. "Cogent medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sassy MolyneuxDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya. SMolyneux@kemri-wellcome.org.
Salla SariolaThe Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dan AllmanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Maartje DijkstraDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evans GichuruDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Susan GrahamKenya Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Dorcas KamuyaDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Gloria GakiiUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brian KayembaUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bernadette KomboDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Allan MalecheKELIN - Reclaiming rights, Rebuilding Live, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jessie MbwamboDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Vicki MarshDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Murugi MicheniDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Noni MumbaDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Michael ParkerThe Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jasmine ShioDepartment of Project Management, Deloitte Consulting Ltd, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Clarence YahWits Reproductive Health & HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Elise van der ElstDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.
Eduard SandersDepartment of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), Kilifi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity engagement, incorporating elements of the broader concepts of public and stakeholder engagement, is increasingly promoted globally, including for health research conducted in developing countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, community engagement needs and challenges are arguably intensified for studies involving gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, where male same-sex sexual interactions are often highly stigmatised and even illegal. This paper contextualises, describes and interprets the discussions and outcomes of an international meeting held at the Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust in Kilifi, Kenya, in November 2013, to critically examine the experiences with community engagement for studies involving men who have sex with men. DISCUSSION: We discuss the ethically charged nature of the language used for men who have sex with men, and of working with 'representatives' of these communities, as well as the complementarity and tensions between a broadly public health approach to community engagement, and a more rights based approach. We highlight the importance of researchers carefully considering which communities to engage with, and the goals, activities, and indicators of success and potential challenges for each. We suggest that, given the unintended harms that can emerge from community engagement (including through labelling, breaches in confidentiality, increased visibility and stigma, and threats to safety), representatives of same-sex populations should be consulted from the earliest possible stage, and that engagement activities should be continuously revised in response to unfolding realities. Engagement should also include less vocal and visible men who have sex with men, and members of other communities with influence on the research, and on research participants and their families and friends. Broader ethics support, advice and research into studies involving men who have sex with men is needed to ensure that ethical challenges - including but not limited to those related to community engagement - are identified and addressed. Underlying challenges and dilemmas linked to stigma and discrimination of men who have sex with men in Africa raise special responsibilities for researchers. Community engagement is an important way of identifying responses to these challenges and responsibilities but itself presents important ethical challenges.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDelivery of Health CareEthics, ResearchHealth ServicesHomosexuality, MalePublic HealthAfrica South of the SaharaDeveloping CountriesHealth Services ResearchHomophobiaHuman RightsHumansMaleResearch DesignResearch PersonnelSocial Discrimination

Identifiers

PMID27234212
PMCPMC4884401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.