ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2016
Genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross mouse diallel panel.
Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- No relationship found between dental fluctuating asymmetry, birthweight, and birth term in two modern North American samples.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association analyses identify genotype-by-environment interactions of growth traits in Simmental cattle.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Developmental instability and phenotypic evolution in a small and isolated bear population.Biology letters · 2021Article
- Article
- The developmental-genetics of canalization.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019Review
- On Zebrafish Disease Models and Matters of the Heart.Biomedicines · 2019Review
- Mouse Skull Mean Shape and Shape Robustness Rely on Different Genetic Architectures and Different Loci.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- QTL Mapping on a Background of Variance Heterogeneity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Redundancy, Feedback, and Robustness in theFrontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- A population level atlas of Mus musculus craniofacial skeleton and automated image-based shape analysis.Journal of anatomy · 2017Article
- Widespread epistasis regulates glucose homeostasis and gene expression.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Development Shapes a Consistent Inbreeding Effect in Mouse Crania of Different Line Crosses.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental stability and canalization describe the ability of developmental systems to minimize phenotypic variation in the face of stochastic micro-environmental effects, genetic variation and environmental influences. Canalization is the ability to minimize the effects of genetic or environmental effects, whereas developmental stability is the ability to minimize the effects of micro-environmental effects within individuals. Despite much attention, the mechanisms that underlie these two components of phenotypic robustness remain unknown. We investigated the genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross (CC) mouse reference population. We analysed the magnitude of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and among-individual variation of cranial shape in reciprocal crosses among the eight parental strains, using geometric morphometrics and a diallel analysis based on a Bayesian approach. Significant differences among genotypes were found for both measures, although they were poorly correlated at the level of individuals. An overall positive effect of inbreeding was found for both components of variation. The strain CAST/EiJ exerted a positive additive effect on FA and, to a lesser extent, among-individual variance. Sex- and other strain-specific effects were not significant. Neither FA nor among-individual variation was associated with phenotypic extremeness. Our results support the existence of genetic variation for both developmental stability and canalization. This finding is important because robustness is a key feature of developmental systems. Our finding that robustness is not related to phenotypic extremeness is consistent with theoretical work that suggests that its relationship to stabilizing selection is not straightforward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.