Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27234042›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2016

Literature review of the role of lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) when combined with excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

Sameh Hany Emile, Mohamed Youssef, Hossam Elfeki, Waleed Thabet, Tito M Abd El-Hamed, Mohamed Farid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sameh Hany EmileGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Dakahlia providence, Egypt. sameh200@hotmail.com.
Mohamed YoussefGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Dakahlia providence, Egypt.
Hossam ElfekiGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Dakahlia providence, Egypt.
Waleed ThabetGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Dakahlia providence, Egypt.
Tito M Abd El-HamedGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Dakahlia providence, Egypt.
Mohamed FaridGeneral Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura city, Dakahlia providence, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimPain following hemorrhoidectomy is a distressing sequel to the procedure. Various methods have been used to alleviate post-hemorrhoidectomy pain; among these methods is the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS). This review aimed to analyze all studies that evaluated the impact of LIS on the outcome of excisional hemorrhoidectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsSeventeen studies were included after organized search of the literature using electronic databases including PubMed/Medline and EMBASE. The studies included comprised 2180 patients with median age of 44 years. Variables selected for the review comprised patients' characteristics, postoperative pain assessment, analgesic consumption, and complications as fecal incontinence (FI), urinary retention, and anal stenosis.

resultsOverall, 933 (42.7 %) patients underwent LIS. Almost all studies assessing postoperative pain reported lower pain scores and less need for postoperative analgesia among patients who underwent LIS in comparison with patients who did not have LIS. Eleven of 13 studies that assessed continence state postoperatively reported higher rates of FI among patients who had LIS with a median rate of 7.7 % versus 1.25 % for patients who did not have LIS. Incidence of urinary retention after LIS ranged from 0 to 60 %. Anal stenosis occurred in 0-14.5 % of patients who had LIS versus 0-36.4 % in patients without LIS.

conclusionLIS effectively reduced postoperative pain and need for analgesics following excisional hemorrhoidectomy. LIS also managed to decrease incidence of postoperative urinary retention and anal stenosis significantly. The negative aspect of adding LIS to excisional hemorrhoidectomy was developing minor FI after surgery which was temporary in duration.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidectomyAdultAnal CanalAnalgesiaDemographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleManometryMiddle AgedPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicExcisionalHemorrhoidectomyLateral internal sphincterotomyReview

Identifiers

PMID27234042
OpenAlexW2407085153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.