Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27233631›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Transition to practice: can rural interprofessional education make a difference? A cohort study.

Susan Sue Pullon, Christine Wilson, Peter Gallagher, Margot Skinner, Eileen McKinlay, Lesley Gray, Patrick McHugh

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Graduate perceptions of their interprofessional practice: Lessons for undergraduate training.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan Sue PullonDepartment Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O.Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand. sue.pullon@otago.ac.nz.
Christine WilsonDepartment Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O.Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
Peter GallagherMedical Education Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O.Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
Margot SkinnerSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, 325 Great King Street, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Eileen McKinlayDepartment Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O.Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
Lesley GrayDepartment Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O.Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
Patrick McHughDepartment Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O.Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition from student to health practitioner at entry-to-practice is complex, requiring critical acquisition of collaborative practice skills. In rural communities where health need is multidimensional, there is potential for multiple intentional collaborative learning objectives to be met concurrently. A five-week, rurally-located, clinically-based interprofessional programme was introduced as a transition-to-practice rotation for final-year, pre-registration health professional students in the professions of dentistry, dietetics, medicine, nursing, pharmacy and physiotherapy. The programme integrated learning objectives in four related domains: interprofessional practice; hauora Māori (Māori health); rural health; long-term condition management. This study investigated student learning experiences over the first two complete years of the programme, comparing responses from participating students with those from a cohort of non-participating peers.

methodsUsing a pre and post quasi-experimental design, respondents from two successive student year cohorts completed questionnaires at the start and end of their final year. Additional survey data were collected from participating students at the end of each rotation.

results131 students participated in the programme during 2013-2014. Participating student respondents (55/131;42 %) reported being significantly better prepared than a cohort of 56 non-participating colleagues in many aspects of their understanding of and knowledge about each of four key learning domains. 94 % (123/131) of programme participants completed end-of-rotation questionnaires. Positive from the outset (mean 5-point Likert scale scores between 3 and 5; 5 = most positive), student satisfaction further increased across all domains in the second year (mean 5-point Likert scale scores between 4 and 5).

conclusionsAt entry-to-practice level, multiple learning objectives, including indigenous health learning, can be met simultaneously in the clinical context within an integrated, rotational programme. Rural settings are highly suitable for delivering such programmes if well supported.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsStudents, Health OccupationsAttitude of Health PersonnelCohort StudiesCooperative BehaviorHealth OccupationsHealth PersonnelHumansNew ZealandPatient Care TeamPhysician's RoleProblem-Based LearningQualitative ResearchRural Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth sciences studentsIndigenous healthInterdisciplinaryInterprofessional educationPre-registrationRural health

Identifiers

PMID27233631
PMCPMC4884367
OpenAlexW2402440846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.