Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27233583›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2017

Stability of the Effect of a Standardized Meal on QTc.

Jörg Täubel, Sara Fernandes, Georg Ferber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The Cardiovascular Effects of a Meal: J-TJournal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  5. Scientific white paper on concentration-QTc modeling.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jörg TäubelRichmond Pharmacology Ltd., St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sara FernandesRichmond Pharmacology Ltd., St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Georg FerberStatistik Georg Ferber GmbH, Riehen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of QTc changes after the intake of a standardized meal has been proposed as an alternative approach to prove assay sensitivity when the proarrhythimic potential of a drug is to be excluded in either TQT or intensive Phase I QT studies.

methodsIn this article, an analysis of the food effect at baseline across periods in two different studies is presented to support the robustness of the method.

resultsThe results show that the time-effect attributed to food is stable over different study periods demonstrating consistency of the physiological response triggered by food.

conclusionsStability and reproducibility of the effect is comparable with moxifloxacin.

Indexed as

AmisulprideAntipsychotic AgentsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEatingElectrocardiographyHealthy VolunteersHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansMorpholinesPostprandial PeriodPyrazolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of Results4-(2-((5-methyl-1-(2-naphthalenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)oxy)ethyl)morpholineAmisulprideAntipsychotic AgentsMorpholinesPyrazolesSulpirideassay sensitivityfood effectintervalQTc

Identifiers

PMID27233583
PMCPMC6931674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.