Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27233093›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2016

Comparative genomic, proteomic and exoproteomic analyses of three Pseudomonas strains reveals novel insights into the phosphorus scavenging capabilities of soil bacteria.

Ian D E A Lidbury, Andrew R J Murphy, David J Scanlan, Gary D Bending, Alexandra M E Jones, Jonathan D Moore, Andrew Goodall, John P Hammond, Elizabeth M H Wellington

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biocontrol and Growth Promotion of Rice byJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Analysis ofGenes · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian D E A LidburySchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7AL, UK. i.lidbury@warwick.ac.uk.
Andrew R J MurphySchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7AL, UK.
David J ScanlanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7AL, UK.
Gary D BendingSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7AL, UK.
Alexandra M E JonesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7AL, UK.
Jonathan D MooreThe Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.
Andrew GoodallSchool of Agriculture, Policy, and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK.
John P HammondSchool of Agriculture, Policy, and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK.
Elizabeth M H WellingtonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GBNorwich Research Park · GBSouthern Cross University · AUUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H531578/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L026074/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L027801/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere of agricultural crops can have a beneficial effect on crop growth. One such mechanism is the microbial-driven solubilization and remineralization of complex forms of phosphorus (P). It is known that bacteria secrete various phosphatases in response to low P conditions. However, our understanding of their global proteomic response to P stress is limited. Here, exoproteomic analysis of Pseudomonas putida BIRD-1 (BIRD-1), Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 and Pseudomonas stutzeri DSM4166 was performed in unison with whole-cell proteomic analysis of BIRD-1 grown under phosphate (Pi) replete and Pi deplete conditions. Comparative exoproteomics revealed marked heterogeneity in the exoproteomes of each Pseudomonas strain in response to Pi depletion. In addition to well-characterized members of the PHO regulon such as alkaline phosphatases, several proteins, previously not associated with the response to Pi depletion, were also identified. These included putative nucleases, phosphotriesterases, putative phosphonate transporters and outer membrane proteins. Moreover, in BIRD-1, mutagenesis of the master regulator, phoBR, led us to confirm the addition of several novel PHO-dependent proteins. Our data expands knowledge of the Pseudomonas PHO regulon, including species that are frequently used as bioinoculants, opening up the potential for more efficient and complete use of soil complexed P.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyCrops, AgriculturalGenomicsPhosphatesPhosphorusProteomicsPseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas putidaPseudomonas stutzeriRegulonRhizospherePhosphatesPhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID27233093
PMCPMC5082522
OpenAlexW2407836164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.