Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27233077›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Evaluating L1CAM expression in human endometrial cancer using qRT-PCR.

Sara Notaro, Daniel Reimer, Michaela Duggan-Peer, Heidi Fiegl, Annamarie Wiedermair, Julia Rössler, Peter Altevogt, Christian Marth, Alain Gustave Zeimet

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic Value of β-Catenin and L1CAM Expressions in Type I Endometrial Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Vav3.1 as prognostic marker in endometrial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara NotaroDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Daniel ReimerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michaela Duggan-PeerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Heidi FieglDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Annamarie WiedermairDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Julia RösslerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter AltevogtSkin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian MarthDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alain Gustave ZeimetDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · ATGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of endometrial carcinoma (EC) still needs improvement of risk assessment. Recently, L1CAM immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation showed a unique value to predict the outcome of early EC. However IHC results are often conflicting for lack of inter-laboratory standardisation.

methodsHere, as a proof of concept and to increase reproducibility we assayed eighty-two EC and 26 normal endometrium samples for L1CAM expression (L1CAMEXP) via qRT-PCR. The IHC evaluation was performed in 50 cancer samples. Moreover, we aimed to substantiate the in-vitro findings of L1CAM regulation through its promoter methylation (L1CAMMET), miR-34a expression and miR-34a promoter methylation. DNA methylation was assessed with MethyLight PCR technique.

resultsHigh overall concordant results between IHC and RT-PCR evaluations were found. L1CAMEXP was detected in 11% of cancer specimens. These positive cancers exhibited a worse DFS (p=0.032) and OS (p=0.016) in a multivariate COX-regression model. L1CAMEXP predicted distant failure (p=0.007) and L1CAMMET predicted risk-reduction of lymph-node involvement (p=0.005). Inverse correlations between L1CAMEXP and L1CAMMET (p=0.004) and between L1CAMEXP and miR-34a expression (p=0.002) were found.

conclusionsIn conclusion qRT-PCR analysis is a reliable approach to evaluate L1CAM status in EC and L1CAMEXP was highly predictive for distant failure and poor outcome, confirming the large IHC-based studies. Interestingly, L1CAMMET was able to assess the risk of pelvic lymph-node involvement. Especially the latter finding has to be confirmed in larger prospective series.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAgedCase-Control StudiesDNA MethylationEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Promoter Regions, GeneticReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsMicroRNAsMIRN34 microRNA, humanNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1endometrial cancerL1CAMmethylationoutcomeqRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID27233077
PMCPMC5130004
OpenAlexW2406630673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.