Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27232951›Full record

ArticleRestorative neurology and neuroscience2016

The effects of bi-hemispheric M1-M1 transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex neurophysiology and metabolite concentration.

Sara Tremblay, Louis-Philippe Lafleur, Sébastien Proulx, Vincent Beaulé, Alex Latulipe-Loiselle, Julien Doyon, Małgorzata Marjańska, Hugo Théoret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. tDCS-Induced Modulation of GABA Levels and Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Older Adults.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara TremblayDépartement de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Louis-Philippe LafleurDépartement de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Sébastien ProulxUnité de Neuroimagerie Fonctionnelle, Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Canada.
Vincent BeauléDépartement de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Alex Latulipe-LoiselleDépartement de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Julien DoyonUnité de Neuroimagerie Fonctionnelle, Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Canada.
Małgorzata MarjańskaCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research and Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Hugo ThéoretDépartement de psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Funding

ZOOMED FUNCT IMAGING IN HUMAN BRAIN AT 7T W/ SIMULT HIGH SPATIAL &TEMPORAL RESP41RR008079 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI DUBINSKY, JANET M · 1993 to 2011
$16.3M
Neuroscience Cores For MR Studies of the BrainP30NS057091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2006 to 2011
$8.5M
NMR Imaging and SpectroscopyP41EB015894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2017
$8.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008079NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015894NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the present study was to assess, in healthy individuals, the impact of M1-M1 tDCS on primary motor cortex excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation and sensorimotor metabolite concentration using 1H-MRS.

methodsFor both experiments, each participant received the three following interventions (20 min tDCS, 1 mA): left-anodal/right-cathodal, left-cathodal/right-anodal, sham. The effects of tDCS were assessed via motor evoked potentials (experiment 1) and metabolite concentrations (experiment 2) immediately after and 12 minutes following the end of stimulation and compared to baseline measurement.

resultsNo effect of M1-M1 tDCS on corticospinal excitability was found. Similarly, M1-M1 tDCS did not significantly modulate metabolite concentrations. High inter-subject variability was noted. Response rate analysis showed a tendency towards inhibition following left-anodal/right-cathodal tDCS in 50% of participants and increased GABA levels in 45% of participants.

conclusionIn line with recent studies showing important inter-subject variability following M1-supraorbital tDCS, the present data show that M1-M1 stimulation is also associated with large response variability. The absence of significant effects suggests that current measures may lack sensitivity to assess changes in M1 neurophysiology and metabolism associated with M1-M1 tDCS.

Indexed as

AdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidHumansMaleMotor CortexProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPyramidal TractsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidGABAglutamateMagnetic resonance spectroscopymotor cortextranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27232951
PMCPMC9924828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.