Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27232944›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Using lymph node swelling as a potential biomarker for successful vaccination.

Kimberly D Brewer, Drew R DeBay, Iulia Dude, Christa Davis, Kerry Lake, Cathryn Parsons, Rajkannan Rajagopalan, Genevieve Weir, Marianne M Stanford, Marc Mansour and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kimberly D BrewerBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.
Drew R DeBayBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.
Iulia DudeBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.
Christa DavisBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kerry LakeBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.
Cathryn ParsonsBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rajkannan RajagopalanImmunovaccine Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada.
Genevieve WeirImmunovaccine Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada.
Marianne M StanfordImmunovaccine Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada.
Marc MansourImmunovaccine Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada.
Chris V BowenBiomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), Halifax, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently a lack of biomarkers to help properly assess novel immunotherapies at both the preclinical and clinical stages of development. Recent work done by our group indicated significant volume changes in the vaccine draining right lymph node (RLN) volumes of mice that had been vaccinated with DepoVaxTM, a lipid-based vaccine platform that was developed to enhance the potency of peptide-based vaccines. These changes in lymph node (LN) volume were unique to vaccinated mice.To better assess the potential of volumetric LN markers for multiple vaccination platforms, we evaluated 100 tumor bearing mice and assessed their response to vaccination with either a DepoVax based vaccine (DPX) or a water-in-oil emulsion (w/o), and compared them to untreated controls. MRI was used to longitudinally monitor LN and tumor volumes weekly over 4 weeks. We then evaluated changes in LN volumes occurring in response to therapy as a potential predictive biomarker for treatment success.We found that for both vaccine types, DPX and w/o, the %RLN volumetric increase over baseline and the ratio of RLN/LLN were strong predictors of successful tumor suppression (LLN is left inguinal LN). The area under the curve (AUC) was greatest, between 0.75-0.85, two (%RLN) or three (RLN/LLN) weeks post-vaccination. For optimized critical thresholds we found these biomarkers consistently had sensitivity >90% and specificity >70% indicating strong prognostic potential. Vaccination with DepoVax had a more pronounced effect on draining lymph nodes than w/o emulsion vaccines, which correlated with a higher anti-tumor activity in DPX-treated mice.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCancer VaccinesCell Line, TumorFemaleLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicBiomarkers, TumorCancer VaccinesbiomarkercanceremulsionImmune responseImmunityImmunology and Microbiology Sectionmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27232944
PMCPMC5094952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.