Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27232234›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2016

The Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario (CAHO) Adopting Research to Improve Care (ARTIC) Program: Reach, Sustainability, Spread and Lessons Learned from an Implementation Funding Model.

Julia E Moore, Michelle Grouchy, Ian D Graham, Maureen Shandling, Winnie Doyle, Sharon E Straus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia E MooreManager, TIES (Team for Implementation, Evaluation, and Sustainability), Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, ON.
Michelle GrouchyProgram Manager, Adopting Research to Improve Care (2011-2015), Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario, Toronto, ON.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Senior Scientist, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.
Maureen ShandlingDepartment of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Winnie DoyleSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Sharon E StrausDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite evidence on what works in healthcare, there is a significant gap in the time it takes to bring research into practice. The Council of Academic Hospitals of Ontario's Adopting Research to Improve Care program addresses this research-to-practice gap by incorporating the following components into its funding program: strategic selection of evidence for implementation, education and training for implementation, implementation supports, executive champions and governance, and evaluation. Funded projects have been sustained (76% reported full sustainability) and spread to over 200 new sites. Lessons learned include the following: assess readiness, develop tailored implementation materials, consider characteristics of implementation supports, protect champion time and consider evaluation feasibility.

Indexed as

Hospitals, UniversityHumansModels, OrganizationalOntarioQuality ImprovementResearch Support as TopicTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID27232234
PMCPMC4872550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.