Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27231951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Identification of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Based Risk Factors for Malnutrition in Elderly Asian Cancer Patients.

Tira Tan, Whee Sze Ong, Tanujaa Rajasekaran, Khai Nee Koo, Li Li Chan, Donald Poon, Anupama Roy Chowdhury, Lalit Krishna, Ravindran Kanesvaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Relationships of emerging biomarkers of cancer cachexia with quality of life, appetite, and cachexia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tira TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-7192
Whee Sze OngDivision of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tanujaa RajasekaranDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Khai Nee KooPerdana University Graduate School of Medicine, Selangor, Malaysia.
Li Li ChanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Donald PoonRaffles Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Anupama Roy ChowdhuryChangi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Lalit KrishnaDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ravindran KanesvaranDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElderly cancer patients are at increased risk for malnutrition. We aim to identify comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) based clinical factors associated with increased nutritional risk and develop a clinical scoring system to identify nutritional risk in elderly cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsCGA data was collected from 249 Asian patients aged 70 years or older. Nutritional risk was assessed based on the Nutrition Screening Initiative (NSI) checklist. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to assess the association between patient clinical factors together with domains within the CGA and moderate to high nutritional risk. Goodness of fit was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Discrimination ability was assessed based on the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Internal validation was performed using simulated datasets via bootstrapping.

resultsAmong the 249 patients, 184 (74%) had moderate to high nutritional risk. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified stage 3-4 disease (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.54; 95% CI, 1.14-5.69), ECOG performance status of 2-4 (OR 3.04; 95% CI, 1.57-5.88), presence of depression (OR 5.99; 95% CI, 1.99-18.02) and haemoglobin levels <12 g/dL (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.54-5.84) as significant independent factors associated with moderate to high nutritional risk. The model achieved good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test's p = 0.17) and discrimination (AUC = 0.80). It retained good calibration and discrimination (bias-corrected AUC = 0.79) under internal validation.

conclusionHaving advanced stage of cancer, poor performance status, depression and anaemia were found to be predictors of moderate to high nutritional risk. Early identification of patients with these risk factors will allow for nutritional interventions that may improve treatment tolerance, quality of life and survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMalnutritionNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingNutrition AssessmentQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID27231951
PMCPMC4883801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.