Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27231872›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Remote Control of Intestinal Stem Cell Activity by Haemocytes in Drosophila.

Sveta Chakrabarti, Jan Paul Dudzic, Xiaoxue Li, Esther Jeanne Collas, Jean-Phillipe Boquete, Bruno Lemaitre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Macrophage restriction inScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Host-Microbe Interactions in Drosophila Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sveta ChakrabartiGlobal Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jan Paul DudzicGlobal Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1657-6958
Xiaoxue LiGlobal Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Esther Jeanne CollasGlobal Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Phillipe BoqueteGlobal Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno LemaitreGlobal Health Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The JAK/STAT pathway is a key signaling pathway in the regulation of development and immunity in metazoans. In contrast to the multiple combinatorial JAK/STAT pathways in mammals, only one canonical JAK/STAT pathway exists in Drosophila. It is activated by three secreted proteins of the Unpaired family (Upd): Upd1, Upd2 and Upd3. Although many studies have established a link between JAK/STAT activation and tissue damage, the mode of activation and the precise function of this pathway in the Drosophila systemic immune response remain unclear. In this study, we used mutations in upd2 and upd3 to investigate the role of the JAK/STAT pathway in the systemic immune response. Our study shows that haemocytes express the three upd genes and that injury markedly induces the expression of upd3 by the JNK pathway in haemocytes, which in turn activates the JAK/STAT pathway in the fat body and the gut. Surprisingly, release of Upd3 from haemocytes upon injury can remotely stimulate stem cell proliferation and the expression of Drosomycin-like genes in the intestine. Our results also suggest that a certain level of intestinal epithelium renewal is required for optimal survival to septic injury. While haemocyte-derived Upd promotes intestinal stem cell activation and survival upon septic injury, haemocytes are dispensable for epithelium renewal upon oral bacterial infection. Our study also indicates that intestinal epithelium renewal is sensitive to insults from both the lumen and the haemocoel. It also reveals that release of Upds by haemocytes coordinates the wound-healing program in multiple tissues, including the gut, an organ whose integrity is critical to fly survival.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFat BodyGene Expression RegulationHemocytesImmunity, InnateIntestinal MucosaIntestinesJanus KinasesMammalsSignal TransductionSTAT Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsDRS protein, Drosophilahop protein, DrosophilaJanus KinasesSTAT Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsUpd2 protein, DrosophilaUpd3 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID27231872
PMCPMC4883764
OpenAlexW2396836231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.