Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27231547›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2016

Re-emergence of the susceptibility of the Salmonella spp. isolated from blood samples to conventional first line antibiotics.

Krishma Laxmi Shrestha, Narayan Dutt Pant, Raju Bhandari, Sabita Khatri, Basudha Shrestha, Binod Lekhak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Prevalence ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Fecal Shedding, Antimicrobial Resistance andInternational journal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High Resistance ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  16. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern ofInfectious disease reports · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology insights · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishma Laxmi ShresthaDepartment of Microbiology, Goldengate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Narayan Dutt PantDepartment of Microbiology, Grande International Hospital, Dhapasi, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Raju BhandariDepartment of Microbiology, Goldengate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sabita KhatriDepartment of Microbiology, Goldengate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Basudha ShresthaDepartment of Microbiology, Kathmandu Model Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Binod LekhakDepartment of Microbiology, Goldengate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Grande International Hospital · NPKathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteric fever is an important public health problem in Nepal. Due to emergence of multidrug resistant strains of Salmonella spp. the conventional first-line drugs, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole have not been used as empiric therapy for treatment of enteric fever for last two decades and there have been increased uses of fluoroquinolones as the drugs of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate and analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella spp.

methodsA total of 620 blood samples collected from the patients suspected of suffering from enteric fever were cultured using standard microbiological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the Salmonella spp., was performed by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique following Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and nalidixic acid were determined by agar dilution method.

resultsOf the total 83 Salmonella spp., 48 (57.83 %) were S. Typhi and 35 (42.26 %) were S. Paratyphi A. Among 83 Salmonella isolates, 98.8 % of the Salmonella spp. were susceptible to chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole and about 97.6 % of the isolates were susceptible to ampicillin. Similarly, 69 (83.13 %) isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid. Only 16.9 % of the isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. One S. Typhi isolate was multidrug resistant.

conclusionThe present study revealed the decreased susceptibility of the S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A to fluoroquinolones, proving them to be inappropriate for empirical therapy for the treatment of enteric fever in our setting. Further the higher susceptibility of the isolates to first line drugs, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole suggests the possibility of using these drugs for empirical therapy.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceEnteric feverFirst line antibioticsFluoroquinolonesNepalSalmonella spp.

Identifiers

PMID27231547
PMCPMC4881163
OpenAlexW2399133269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.