Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27231125›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2016

Clinical Evaluation of Fully Automated Elecsys

Dongdong Li, Jingna An, Tingting Wang, Chuanmin Tao, Lanlan Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongdong LiDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jingna AnDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tingting WangDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chuanmin TaoDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. taochuanmin@sina.com.
Lanlan WangDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe resurgence of syphilis in recent years has become a serious threat to the public health worldwide, and the serological detection of specific antibodies against Treponema pallidum (TP) remains the most reliable method for laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. The performance of the Elecsys

methodsIn comparison with InTec assay, the Elecsys

resultsThere was an overall agreement of 99.58% between two assays (Kappa = 0.975). The sensitivity and specificity of the Elecsys

conclusionConsidering the excellent ease of use and automation, high throughput, and its superior sensitivity, especially in primary syphilis, the Elecsys

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumAntibodies, Bacterialimmunoassaysensitivityspecificitysyphilis

Identifiers

PMID27231125
PMCPMC6807250
OpenAlexW2404228347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.