Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27231044›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical research2017

Monitoring cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy and stenting.

Jian Li, Ahmed Shalabi, Fuhai Ji, Lingzhong Meng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver Reduces Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity in Patients During Carotid Endarterectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Cerebral pulse oximetry in carotid endarterectomy: an impact study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Anesthetic approaches in carotid body tumor surgery.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.
Ahmed ShalabiDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Fuhai JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China.
Lingzhong MengDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. meng.lingzhong@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current therapy for carotid stenosis mainly includes carotid endarterectomy and endovascular stenting, which may incur procedure-related cerebral ischemia. Several methods have been employed for monitoring cerebral ischemia during surgery, such as awake neurocognitive assessment, electroencephalography, evoked potentials, transcranial Doppler, carotid stump pressure, and near infrared spectroscopy. However, there is no consensus on the gold standard or the method that is superior to others at present. Keeping patient awake for real time neurocognitive assessment is effective and essential; however, not every surgeon adopts it. In patients under general anesthesia, cerebral ischemia monitoring has to rely on non-awake technologies. The advantageous and disadvantageous properties of each monitoring method are reviewed.

Indexed as

carotid artery stentingcarotid endarterectomycerebral ischemia monitoring

Identifiers

PMID27231044
PMCPMC5274507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.