Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27231025›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

Stakeholders in support systems for self-care for chronic illness: the gap between expectations and reality regarding their identity, roles and relationships.

María J Pumar-Méndez, Agurtzane Mujika, Elena Regaira, Ivaylo Vassilev, Mari Carmen Portillo, Christina Foss, Elka Todorova, Poli Roukova, Ingrid A Ruud Knutsen, Manuel Serrano and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

María J Pumar-MéndezSchool of Nursing, University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Agurtzane MujikaSchool of Nursing, University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Elena RegairaQuality Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Ivaylo VassilevFaculty of Health Sciences, NIHR Wessex CLAHRC, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Mari Carmen PortilloFaculty of Health Sciences, NIHR Wessex CLAHRC, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Christina FossInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elka TodorovaDepartment of Economic Sociology, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Poli RoukovaDepartment of Economic and Social Geography, NIGGG, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ingrid A Ruud KnutsenInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Manuel SerranoEducation, Health and Society Foundation, Murcia, Spain.
Christos LionisClinic of Social and Family Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Michel WensingRadboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne RogersFaculty of Health Sciences, NIHR Wessex CLAHRC, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
University of Southampton · GBUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversity of Oslo · NOBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BGClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of National and World Economy · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe spread of self-care holds the promise of containing chronic illness burden. Falling within the framework of a FP7 collaborative research project, this paper reports the views of key informants from six countries regarding who the main stakeholders are at different levels in the support system for self-care for patients with chronic illness (SSSC) and how they accomplish their role and collaborate.

methods90 Interviews with purposefully selected key informants from Bulgaria, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and United Kingdom were conducted. Interviews involved government and local authorities, politicians, academics, health professionals and private sector representatives. Interviewers followed an expert opinion-based guide. Analysis involved a cross-country examination with thematic analysis and framework method techniques.

resultsKey informants described the ideal SSSC as inclusive, interdependent and patient-centred. The following main stakeholders in SSSC were identified: patients, governments, health-care professionals, associations, private companies and the media. In the current SSSCs, collaboration among stakeholders within and across different levels was said to be lacking. Patients were seen as playing a passive subordinate role based on the following: their own attitudes; the paternalistic and medicalized attitudes of the health-care professionals; their misrepresentation by patient associations; and their exposure to the damaging influences of media and industries.

conclusionsMaking SSSC patient-centred constitutes the greatest challenge for European authorities. Strategies must be revised for promoting patient participation. They should undergo changes so as to promote industry and media social responsibility and patient association advocacy capacity.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseLeadershipSocial SupportHealth PersonnelHealth PolicyHumansPatient-Centered CareSelf Carechronic illnesscross-national researchpatient-centred careself-careself-management supportstakeholders

Identifiers

PMID27231025
PMCPMC5433542
OpenAlexW2394747217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.