Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27230996›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016

Routine Cyst Fluid Cytology Is Not Indicated in the Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.

Lawrence A Shirley, Jon Walker, Somashekar Krishna, Samer El-Dika, Peter Muscarella, E Christopher Ellison, Carl R Schmidt, Mark Bloomston

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence A ShirleyDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Ave, N924 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. lawrence.shirley@osumc.edu.
Jon WalkerDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Somashekar KrishnaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Samer El-DikaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Peter MuscarellaDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
E Christopher EllisonDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Carl R SchmidtDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Ave, N924 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Mark BloomstonDivision of Surgical Oncology, 21st Century Oncology, Ft. Myers, FL, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US21st Century Oncology (United States) · USMontefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe work-up of cystic lesions of the pancreas often involves endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA). In addition to CEA and amylase measurement, fluid is routinely sent for cytologic examination. We evaluated the utility of cytologic findings in clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND

methodsRecords of patients who underwent EUS-guided pancreatic cyst aspiration were reviewed. Findings from axial imaging and EUS were compared to cyst fluid cytology as well as fluid amylase and CEA. All results were then compared to final diagnosis, determined by clinical analysis for those patients not resected, and surgical pathology report for those who underwent resection.

resultsA total of 167 patients were reviewed. Of 48 patients with suspicious findings on imaging, cytology yielded diagnostic information in 89.6 % of cases (43 patients). However, in the 119 patients where no suspicious components were revealed on imaging, fluid cytology yielded no significant diagnostic results in any case. In all cases where mucin was noted on cytologic review, thick fluid was also seen at the time of aspiration. DISCUSSION: In our cohort of patients with cystic pancreatic lesions, cytologic analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid yielded no diagnostic benefit over radiologic findings alone. In such cases where fluid is to be aspirated, specimens that would otherwise be sent for cytologic evaluation would be better served for other purposes, such as molecular analysis or banking for future research.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmylasesCarcinoembryonic AntigenClinical Decision-MakingCyst FluidCytodiagnosisEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMucinsAmylasesCarcinoembryonic AntigenMucinsAmylasesCarcinoembryonic antigenCytologyPancreatic cystsPancreatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27230996
OpenAlexW2402189188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.