Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27230934›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2016

First results and follow-up of a second-generation circular mapping and ablation catheter.

Stefan Weber, Martin Höher, Dominik Schultes

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary vein isolation using second-generation single-shot devices: not all the same?Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan WeberKlinikum Bayreuth, Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Bayreuth, Germany. stefan.weber@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
Martin HöherKlinikum Bayreuth, Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Bayreuth, Germany.
Dominik SchultesKlinikum Bayreuth, Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Bayreuth, Germany.
Bayreuth Medical Center · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency energy is widely used as a strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Anatomically designed catheters have been developed to increase the efficiency of AF ablation procedures. The second-generation circular ablation catheter, PVAC GOLD, was re-designed to improve energy delivery and mitigate emboli. We investigated the procedural efficiency, biophysics, and chronic efficacy of PVAC GOLD in patients with AF.

methodsWe consecutively enrolled 40 patients (60 ± 11 years) with highly symptomatic, drug refractory AF. The first 20 patients were treated with the first-generation PVAC. The subsequent 20 patients were treated with the second-generation PVAC GOLD catheter. All patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months.

resultsAll 164 targeted PVs were successfully isolated. Ablations performed with PVAC GOLD showed a significant reduction in total number of ablations needed for PVI, fluoroscopy, and procedure times compared to PVAC (34.7 ± 7.0 vs. 27.0 ± 6.5; p = 0.009), fluoroscopy (29.5 ± 9.5 vs. 23.4 ± 7.0; p = 0.026), and procedure time (93.8 ± 18.9 vs. 83.1 ± 10.6; p = 0.033). PVAC GOLD showed improved biophysics including a reduction of low power ablations and an increase in mean effective energy delivery. At 12 months follow-up, AF recurrence rates were comparable in the two groups (35 vs. 30 %; p = 0.735). There were no adverse events.

conclusionsThe redesigned PVAC GOLD catheter demonstrates a reduction in radiofrequency ablation and procedure time and improved biophysics while maintaining chronic efficacy compared to the first-generation PVAC.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationBody Surface Potential MappingCatheter AblationEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRecurrenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySurgery, Computer-AssistedAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationMulti-electrode ablation catheterPhased RF

Identifiers

PMID27230934
OpenAlexW2407204723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.