Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27230659›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

Acute kidney injury prediction in cardiac surgery patients by a urinary peptide pattern: a case-control validation study.

Jochen Metzger, William Mullen, Holger Husi, Angelique Stalmach, Stefan Herget-Rosenthal, Heiner V Groesdonk, Harald Mischak, Matthias Klingele

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CE-MS for Proteomics and Intact Protein Analysis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Urinary Peptidomic Biomarkers in Kidney Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jochen MetzgerMosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany. metzger@mosaiques-diagnostics.com.
William MullenInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, UK.
Holger HusiInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, UK.
Angelique StalmachInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, UK.
Stefan Herget-RosenthalDepartment of Medicine and Nephrology, Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany.
Heiner V GroesdonkDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg-Saar, Germany.
Harald MischakMosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Matthias KlingeleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Hypertension, Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg-Saar, Germany.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a prominent problem in hospitalized patients and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Clinical medicine is currently hampered by the lack of accurate and early biomarkers for diagnosis of AKI and the evaluation of the severity of the disease. In 2010, we established a multivariate peptide marker pattern consisting of 20 naturally occurring urinary peptides to screen patients for early signs of renal failure. The current study now aims to evaluate if, in a different study population and potentially various AKI causes, AKI can be detected early and accurately by proteome analysis.

methodsUrine samples from 60 patients who developed AKI after cardiac surgery were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS). The obtained peptide profiles were screened by the AKI peptide marker panel for early signs of AKI. Accuracy of the proteomic model in this patient collective was compared to that based on urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) ELISA levels. Sixty patients who did not develop AKI served as negative controls.

resultsFrom the 120 patients, 110 were successfully analyzed by CE-MS (59 with AKI, 51 controls). Application of the AKI panel demonstrated an AUC in receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of 0.81 (95 % confidence interval: 0.72-0.88). Compared to the proteomic model, ROC analysis revealed poorer classification accuracy of NGAL and KIM-1 with the respective AUC values being outside the statistical significant range (0.63 for NGAL and 0.57 for KIM-1).

conclusionsThis study gives further proof for the general applicability of our proteomic multimarker model for early and accurate prediction of AKI irrespective of its underlying disease cause.

Indexed as

Predictive Value of TestsAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedBiomarkersCardiac Surgical ProceduresCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesProspective StudiesProteomicsBiomarkersPeptidesAcute kidney injuryCardiac surgeryPredictionTest validationUrinary peptide pattern

Identifiers

PMID27230659
PMCPMC4882859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.