ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Discovering causal interactions using Bayesian network scoring and information gain.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diabetes mellitus early warning and factor analysis using ensemble Bayesian networks with SMOTE-ENN and Boruta.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Machine Learning to Discern Interactive Clusters of Risk Factors for Late Recurrence of Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Synthetic data generation with probabilistic Bayesian Networks.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2021Article
- Genomic prediction and QTL mapping of root system architecture and above-ground agronomic traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with a multitrait index and Bayesian networks.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Genetic interactions effects for cancer disease identification using computational models: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Review
- A Belief Degree-Associated Fuzzy Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Framework for Epistasis Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Connecting Social Psychology and Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Probabilistic Predictor on the Intention to Do Home-Based Physical Activity After Message Exposure.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Prediction models for acute kidney injury in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a real-world study based on Bayesian networks.Renal failure · 2020Article
- Leveraging Bayesian networks and information theory to learn risk factors for breast cancer metastasis.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A novel machine learning algorithm, Bayesian networks model, to predict the high-risk patients with cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Epi-GTBN: an approach of epistasis mining based on genetic Tabu algorithm and Bayesian network.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Using natural language processing and machine learning to identify breast cancer local recurrence.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Network Intervention, a Method to Address Complex Therapeutic Strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- A Primer on Bayesian Decision Analysis With an Application to a Kidney Transplant Decision.Transplantation · 2016Review
- Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsReview
- Bayesian Network Construction and Genotype-Phenotype Inference Using GWAS Statistics.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe problem of learning causal influences from data has recently attracted much attention. Standard statistical methods can have difficulty learning discrete causes, which interacting to affect a target, because the assumptions in these methods often do not model discrete causal relationships well. An important task then is to learn such interactions from data. Motivated by the problem of learning epistatic interactions from datasets developed in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), researchers conceived new methods for learning discrete interactions. However, many of these methods do not differentiate a model representing a true interaction from a model representing non-interacting causes with strong individual affects. The recent algorithm MBS-IGain addresses this difficulty by using Bayesian network learning and information gain to discover interactions from high-dimensional datasets. However, MBS-IGain requires marginal effects to detect interactions containing more than two causes. If the dataset is not high-dimensional, we can avoid this shortcoming by doing an exhaustive search.
resultsWe develop Exhaustive-IGain, which is like MBS-IGain but does an exhaustive search. We compare the performance of Exhaustive-IGain to MBS-IGain using low-dimensional simulated datasets based on interactions with marginal effects and ones based on interactions without marginal effects. Their performance is similar on the datasets based on marginal effects. However, Exhaustive-IGain compellingly outperforms MBS-IGain on the datasets based on 3 and 4-cause interactions without marginal effects. We apply Exhaustive-IGain to investigate how clinical variables interact to affect breast cancer survival, and obtain results that agree with judgements of a breast cancer oncologist.
conclusionsWe conclude that the combined use of information gain and Bayesian network scoring enables us to discover higher order interactions with no marginal effects if we perform an exhaustive search. We further conclude that Exhaustive-IGain can be effective when applied to real data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.