Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27230043›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2016

Beyond Coronary Calcification, Family History, and C-Reactive Protein: Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction.

Purav Mody, Parag H Joshi, Amit Khera, Colby R Ayers, Anand Rohatgi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Reduced antioxidant high-density lipoprotein function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Purav ModyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Parag H JoshiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amit KheraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Colby R AyersDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Anand RohatgiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: Anand.Rohatgi@utsouthwestern.edu.
Southwestern Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
Moving Beyond HDL Cholesterol, HDL Function as a Coronary Disease BiomarkerK08HL118131 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROHATGI, ANAND KUMAR · 2013 to 2017
$665k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL118131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), which is a key step in the reverse cholesterol transport pathway, is independently associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, whether it predicts ASCVD beyond validated novel risk markers is unknown.

objectivesThis study assessed if CEC improved ACSVD risk prediction beyond using coronary artery calcium (CAC), family history (FH), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

methodsCEC, CAC, self-reported FH, and hs-CRP were assessed among participants without baseline ASCVD who were enrolled in the Dallas Heart Study (DHS). ASCVD was defined as a first nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, coronary revascularization, or cardiovascular death, assessed over a median 9.4 years. Risk prediction was assessed using various modeling techniques and improvements in the c-statistic, the integrated discrimination index (IDI), and the net reclassification index (NRI).

resultsThe mean age of the population (N = 1,972) was 45 years, 52% had CAC (>0), 31% had FH, and 58% had elevated hs-CRP (≥2 mg/l). CEC greater than the median was associated with a 50% reduced incidence of ASCVD in those with CAC (5.4% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.003), FH (5.8% vs. 10%; p = 0.05), and elevated hs-CRP (3.8% vs. 7.9%; p = 0.004). CEC improved all metrics of discrimination and reclassification when added to CAC (c-statistic, p = 0.004; IDI, p = 0.02; NRI: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13 to 0.53), FH (c-statistic, p = 0.006; IDI, p = 0.008; NRI: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.55), or elevated hs-CRP (c-statistic p = 0.008; IDI p = 0.02; NRI: 0.36; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.52).

conclusionsCEC improves ASCVD risk prediction beyond using CAC, FH, and hs-CRP and warrants consideration as a novel ASCVD risk marker.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyRisk AssessmentVascular CalcificationBiological TransportCholesterolCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationCholesterolC-Reactive Proteincholesterol efflux capacitycoronary artery calciumfamily historyhigh-density lipoproteinrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID27230043
PMCPMC4884307
OpenAlexW2397295950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.