ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2016
Nanoparticles and direct immunosuppression.
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: Agents of thermal and immune therapies.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Nanotechnology-Based Immunostimulants in Aquaculture: Mechanisms, Advances and Practical Applications.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Translating Antiviral Therapies to Veterinary Use: A Review of Immunomodulatory Agents for Potential Application in Aleutian Mink Diseases.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Macrophage membrane coated nanoscale coordination polymers promote graft survival in allogeneic transplantation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Nanoparticle-induced systemic toxicity and immune response inFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Immunoprotection of cellular transplants for autoimmune type 1 diabetes through local drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Nano-immunotherapy: overcoming delivery challenge of immune checkpoint therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Review
- Challenges and advances for glioma therapy based on inorganic nanoparticles.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Recurrent flares of verruca plana arising at the site of embedded metal shrapnel exacerbated by UV exposure.JAAD case reports · 2023Article
- Progress in nanoparticle-based regulation of immune cells.Medical review (2021) · 2023Review
- Antitumor Activity of Chitosan-Coated Iron Oxide Nanocomposite Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Animal Models.Biological trace element research · 2023Article
- Review
- Bionized Nanoferrite Particles Alter the Course of Experimental Cryptococcus neoformans Pneumonia.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Immunotherapeutic nanoparticles: From autoimmune disease control to the development of vaccines.Biomaterials advances · 2022Review
- Delivering Therapeutics to Glioblastoma: Overcoming Biological Constraints.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Mechanisms of immune response to inorganic nanoparticles and their degradation products.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Upcycling discarded cellulosic surgical masks into catalytically active freestanding materials.Cellulose (London, England) · 2022Article
- Biocompatibility of nanomaterials and their immunological properties.Biomedical materials (Bristol, England) · 2021Review
- The Use of Nanobiotechnology in Immunology and Vaccination.Vaccines · 2021Article
- Bridging the gap between toxicity and carcinogenicity of mineral fibres by connecting the fibre crystal-chemical and physical parameters to the key characteristics of cancer.Current research in toxicology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeting the immune system with nanomaterials is an intensely active area of research. Specifically, the capability to induce immunosuppression is a promising complement for drug delivery and regenerative medicine therapies. Many novel strategies for immunosuppression rely on nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for small-molecule immunosuppressive compounds. As a consequence, efforts in understanding the mechanisms in which nanoparticles directly interact with the immune system have been overshadowed. The immunological activity of nanoparticles is dependent on the physiochemical properties of the nanoparticles and its subsequent cellular internalization. As the underlying factors for these reactions are elucidated, more nanoparticles may be engineered and evaluated for inducing immunosuppression and complementing immunosuppressive drugs. This review will briefly summarize the state-of-the-art and developments in understanding how nanoparticles induce immunosuppressive responses, compare the inherent properties of nanomaterials which induce these immunological reactions, and comment on the potential for using nanomaterials to modulate and control the immune system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.