Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27229866›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli.

Tryntsje Cuperus, Albert van Dijk, Mieke G R Matthijs, Edwin J A Veldhuizen, Henk P Haagsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Control ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. CATH-2-derived antimicrobial peptide inhibits multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Avian PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Avian PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tryntsje CuperusDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases &Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert van DijkDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases &Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mieke G R MatthijsDivision of Poultry Health, Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Edwin J A VeldhuizenDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases &Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Henk P HaagsmanDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases &Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing antibiotic resistance and ever stricter control on antibiotic use are a driving force to develop alternatives to antibiotics. One such strategy is the use of multifunctional Host Defense Peptides. Here we examined the protective effect of prophylactic treatment with the D analog of chicken cathelicidin-2 (D-CATH-2) against a respiratory E. coli infection. Chickens were treated with D-CATH-2 in ovo at day 18 of embryonic development or intramuscularly at days 1 and 4 after hatch. At 7 days of age, birds were challenged intratracheally with avian pathogenic E. coli. Protection was evaluated by recording mortality, morbidity (Mean Lesion Score) and bacterial swabs of air sacs at 7 days post-infection. In ovo D-CATH-2 treatment significantly reduced morbidity (63%) and respiratory bacterial load (>90%), while intramuscular treatment was less effective. D-CATH-2 increased the percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes and heterophils by both administration routes. E. coli specific IgM levels were lower in in ovo treated animals compared to intramuscular D-CATH-2 treatment. In short, in ovo treatment with the Host Defense Peptide derived D-CATH-2 can partially protect chickens from E. coli infection, making this peptide an interesting starting point to develop alternatives to antibiotics for use in the poultry sector.

Indexed as

ChickensEscherichia coli InfectionsPoultry DiseasesAnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCathelicidinsChick EmbryoEscherichia coliAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCathelicidins

Identifiers

PMID27229866
PMCPMC4882517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.