ReviewClinics in chest medicine2016
Sepsis Resuscitation: Fluid Choice and Dose.
Review in Clinics in chest medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy of various resuscitation fluids in the management of sepsis in postoperative surgical and trauma patients: a systematic review and meta--analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024Pooled it
- European Society of Intensive Care Medicine clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients. Part 1: the choice of resuscitation fluids.Intensive care medicine · 2024Guideline
- Chloremia Disturbances in Critical Care: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Impact and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Biomarkers to guide sepsis management.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Sepsis, Management & Advances in Metabolomics.Nanotheranostics · 2024Review
- Sepsis Management in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Prognostic models for estimating severity of disease and predicting 30-day mortality of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: a bicentric retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- New Insights into the Fluid Management in Patients with Septic Shock.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Fluid Stewardship of Maintenance Intravenous Fluids.Journal of pharmacy practice · 2022Review
- Review
- Sepsis-associated brain injury: underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies for acute and long-term cognitive impairments.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2022Review
- Changes in the Cardiac Index Induced by Unilateral Passive Leg Raising in Spontaneously Breathing Patients: A Novel Way to Assess Fluid Responsiveness.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Early combination of albumin with crystalloids administration might be beneficial for the survival of septic patients: a retrospective analysis from MIMIC-IV database.Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- Fluid Stewardship During Critical Illness: A Call to Action.Journal of pharmacy practice · 2020Article
- Comparative Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Ceftriaxone and Ertapenem in Normoalbuminemia, Hypoalbuminemia, and Albumin Replacement in a Sheep Model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Effect of initial infusion rates of fluid resuscitation on outcomes in patients with septic shock: a historical cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Targeting the Blood-Brain Barrier to Prevent Sepsis-Associated Cognitive Impairment.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2019Review
- Septic shock in the ER: diagnostic and management challenges.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2019Article
- Is Albumin-based Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Justifiable? An Evidence from a Cost-effectiveness Evaluation.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a common and life-threatening inflammatory response to severe infection treated with antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. Despite the central role of intravenous fluid in sepsis management, fundamental questions regarding which fluid and in what amount remain unanswered. Recent advances in understanding the physiologic response to fluid administration, and large clinical studies examining resuscitation strategies, fluid balance after resuscitation, colloid versus crystalloid solutions, and high- versus low-chloride crystalloids, inform the current approach to sepsis fluid management and suggest areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.