ReviewPediatric radiology2016
How we do it: MR enterography.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Routine Orogastric Tube Placement Reveals an Unexpected Diagnosis Resulting in a Change in Therapy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Effects of Hyoscine Butylbromide in Childhood.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Role of abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MR-enterography in the evaluation of Crohn's disease activity and complications as an alternative for full protocol contrast-enhanced study: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2023Article
- Autoinflammatory diseases in childhood, part 2: polygenic syndromes.Pediatric radiology · 2020Article
- Fast Magnetic Resonance Enterography Protocol for the Evaluation of Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2020Article
- Magnetic resonance enterography evaluation of Crohn disease activity and mucosal healing in young patients.Pediatric radiology · 2018Review
- Comparison of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance (MR) Enterography in Evaluation Patients with Crohn's Disease.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) now plays a central role in diagnosing pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and its role in other intestinal pathologies such as scleroderma is gradually expanding. MRE helps distinguish between Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, defining extent and severity. Standard MRE protocols can be optimized in children and adolescents to be diagnostic and well tolerated, both of which are important with increasing use of serial MRE in pediatric IBD for monitoring treatment response and evaluating complications. MRI is especially suited to this role given its lack of ionizing radiation. MRE compliance can be improved through patient education. Differing from adult MRE, pediatric MRE protocols use weight-based formulas to calculate oral and intravenous contrast media and antispasmodic agent doses, using either hyoscine-N-butylbromide or glucagon. Nausea is more commonly experienced with glucagon; however vomiting occurs in <10% of children with either agent. Standard and advanced sequences applied in adults are also used in children and adolescents. These include static and cinematic balanced steady-state free precession sequences, single-shot T2-weighted sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging and pre- and post-contrast 3-D T1-weighted gradient echo sequences. Magnetization transfer imaging and quantitative assessment of bowel to distinguish inflammation and fibrosis are not yet standard in pediatric MRE, but show promise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27229500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.